[IPP] Errata resolution draft of IPP Finishings 2.1.1 posted for review

[Michael Sweet]

Smith,

Aside from bumping the copyrights and references as needed, I don't think you need to do much (2.1 is recent enough...)


> On Oct 22, 2020, at 4:30 PM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & IPP Standards) <smith.kennedy at hp.com> wrote:
> 
> OK. Do you think I need to "pour" the content into the most recent template for this errata update? It won't probably take that long to do so, but I didn't want to do it if the group didn't think it was necessary.
> 
> Smith
> 
> 
> 
>> On Oct 22, 2020, at 2:27 PM, Michael Sweet <msweet at msweet.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Smith,
>> 
>> My only nit at the moment is that we only do major.minor numbering for documents. This should be IPP Finishings 2.2... :)
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> 
>> > On Oct 22, 2020, at 4:17 PM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & IPP Standards) via ipp <ipp at pwg.org> wrote:
>> > 
>> > Hi there,
>> > 
>> > I've posted a draft of IPP Finishings 2.1.1 that resolves the errata currently reported for IPP Finishings 2.1. The draft is here:
>> > 
>> > https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippfinishings211-20201022.pdf 
>> > https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippfinishings211-20201022.docx 
>> > https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippfinishings211-20201022-rev.pdf 
>> > https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippfinishings211-20201022-rev.docx
>> > 
>> > These are the changes:
>> > 
>> > Resolved errata reported to PWG website:
>> > - Issue #56 (https://www.pwg.org/dynamo/issues.php?U56) - Section 11.1 lacks mention of attributes and language clarifying shape / size / rotation of staples and punch
>> > 
>> > - Issue #87 (https://www.pwg.org/dynamo/issues.php?U87) - Section 5.1: uses of "feed-orientation" and "orientation-requested" lack source reference citations
>> > 
>> > - Issue #88 (https://www.pwg.org/dynamo/issues.php?U88) - Section 5.1.1 says 'RFC 2911 "finishings" Values'
>> > 
>> > - Moved the definition of the 'trim-after-pages', 'trim-after-documents', 'trim-after-copies' and 'trim-after-job' enum value here since the originating document [PWG5100.13] is being updated at the time these v2.1.1 errata issues were being resolved.
>> > 
>> > Cheers,
>> > 
>> > Smith
>> > 
>> > /**
>> > Smith Kennedy
>> > HP Inc.
>> > */
>> > 
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > ipp mailing list
>> > ipp at pwg.org
>> > https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
>> 
>> ________________________
>> Michael Sweet
>> 
>> 
> 

________________________
Michael Sweet