[IPP] Errata resolution draft of IPP Finishings 2.1.1 posted for review

[Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & IPP Standards)]

OK. Do you think I need to "pour" the content into the most recent template for this errata update? It won't probably take that long to do so, but I didn't want to do it if the group didn't think it was necessary.

Smith



> On Oct 22, 2020, at 2:27 PM, Michael Sweet <msweet at msweet.org> wrote:
> 
> Smith,
> 
> My only nit at the moment is that we only do major.minor numbering for documents. This should be IPP Finishings 2.2... :)
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> 
> > On Oct 22, 2020, at 4:17 PM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & IPP Standards) via ipp <ipp at pwg.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi there,
> >
> > I've posted a draft of IPP Finishings 2.1.1 that resolves the errata currently reported for IPP Finishings 2.1. The draft is here:
> >
> > https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippfinishings211-20201022.pdf <https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippfinishings211-20201022.pdf>
> > https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippfinishings211-20201022.docx <https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippfinishings211-20201022.docx>
> > https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippfinishings211-20201022-rev.pdf <https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippfinishings211-20201022-rev.pdf>
> > https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippfinishings211-20201022-rev.docx <https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippfinishings211-20201022-rev.docx>
> >
> > These are the changes:
> >
> > Resolved errata reported to PWG website:
> > - Issue #56 (https://www.pwg.org/dynamo/issues.php?U56 <https://www.pwg.org/dynamo/issues.php?U56>) - Section 11.1 lacks mention of attributes and language clarifying shape / size / rotation of staples and punch
> >
> > - Issue #87 (https://www.pwg.org/dynamo/issues.php?U87 <https://www.pwg.org/dynamo/issues.php?U87>) - Section 5.1: uses of "feed-orientation" and "orientation-requested" lack source reference citations
> >
> > - Issue #88 (https://www.pwg.org/dynamo/issues.php?U88 <https://www.pwg.org/dynamo/issues.php?U88>) - Section 5.1.1 says 'RFC 2911 "finishings" Values'
> >
> > - Moved the definition of the 'trim-after-pages', 'trim-after-documents', 'trim-after-copies' and 'trim-after-job' enum value here since the originating document [PWG5100.13] is being updated at the time these v2.1.1 errata issues were being resolved.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Smith
> >
> > /**
> > Smith Kennedy
> > HP Inc.
> > */
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ipp mailing list
> > ipp at pwg.org
> > https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp <https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>
> 
> ________________________
> Michael Sweet
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20201022/00689ad9/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20201022/00689ad9/attachment.sig>