---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic at gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 2:38 PM
Subject: Re: Thanks Ira<eom>
To: "Zehler, Peter" <Peter.Zehler at xerox.com>, Ira McDonald <
blueroofmusic at gmail.com>
Hi Pete,
Inline.
Cheers,
- Ira
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Zehler, Peter <Peter.Zehler at xerox.com>wrote:
> Ira,****
>> We’ll have a chance to rectify that soon. I have two unrelated questions*
> ***
>> **1) **Do you know what ever became of <
>ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/new_COLOR/pwg-ipp-color-and-imaging-v02-021205.pdf>
> ?
><ira> EEK! No, I think this spec just got lost - we should share this with
Mike and the IPP folks.
According the IPP and SM mail archives, it was discussed on 5 Dec 2002
at an SM telecon - but there are NO SM minutes after 7 Nov 2002 and
before 23 January 2003 in the SM ftp minutes archive - hmm...
</ira>
> ****
>> **2) **Do you think the title of the PWG Print Job Ticket
> specification should be “PWG Print Job Ticket for Cloud Based Printing”?
><ira> No - Instead, I suggest "PWG Print Job Ticket Semantic Model"
with use case(s), design requirements, and implementation notes for
Cloud Printing (and IPP Everywhere?).
Because we don't want to keep rewriting a core SM spec for different
audiences, IMHO.
</ira>
> ****
>> Pete****
>> ** **
>> ** **
>> Peter Zehler
>> Xerox Research Center Webster
> Email: Peter.Zehler at Xerox.com> Voice: (585) 265-8755
> FAX: (585) 265-7441
> US Mail: Peter Zehler
> Xerox Corp.
> 800 Phillips Rd.
> M/S 128-25E
> Webster NY, 14580-9701 ****
>> ** **
>> *From:* Ira McDonald [mailto:blueroofmusic at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 09, 2011 12:58 PM
> *To:* Zehler, Peter; Ira McDonald
> *Subject:* Re: Thanks Ira<eom>****
>> ** **
>> Hi Pete,
>> You're welcome - and thanks for the reminder yesterday.
>> Reading Nancy's section in FaxIn 14.1 (your new FaxOut 13.1)
> about protecting the End User's data, I'm thinking that the
> Security Considerations section in MFD Model is defective
> in punting so completely about security - certainly neither
> Cloud Print nor IPP Everywhere can blithely ignore security
> requirements.
>> Cheers,
> - Ira
>>> Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
> Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
> Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP WG
> Chair - TCG Embedded Systems Hardcopy SWG
> IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
> Blue Roof Music/High North Inc
>http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic>http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc> mailto:blueroofmusic at gmail.com> Christmas through April:
> 579 Park Place Saline, MI 48176
> 734-944-0094
> May to Christmas:
> PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839
> 906-494-2434****
>>>> ****
>> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Zehler, Peter <Peter.Zehler at xerox.com>
> wrote:****
>> ****
>> ****
>> ****
>> Peter Zehler
>> Xerox Research Center Webster
> Email: Peter.Zehler at Xerox.com> Voice: (585) 265-8755
> FAX: (585) 265-7441
> US Mail: Peter Zehler
> Xerox Corp.
> 800 Phillips Rd.
> M/S 128-25E
> Webster NY, 14580-9701 ****
>> ****
>> *From:* Ira McDonald [mailto:blueroofmusic at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 09, 2011 12:47 PM
> *To:* Michael R Sweet; Paul Tykodi; Zehler, Peter; Ira McDonald
> *Subject:* PWG MFD FaxOut Service Formal Vote-<High
> North>-<McDonald>-<Yes>****
>> ****
>> Hi, Tuesday (9 August 2011)
>> Based on the FaxIn review at last week's PWG meeting, High North votes
> YES with the following editorial comments:
>> Cheers,
> - Ira
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [Comments on "wd-mfdfaxoutmodel10-20110705.pdf"]
>> Line 242-244 - inaccurate out-of-scope
> - per FaxIn review - change section 4.2, item 1 to:
> "Semantics of any compound service that creates separate Jobs for each
> transform service or destination URI specified in the original Job."
>>> Line 308-311 - PSTN Fax multiple document jobs issue
> - per FaxIn review - add sentence to end of section 6, last paragraph:
> "Note that PSTN FaxOut jobs either: (a) do not support multiple
> documents; or (b) do not distinguish the document boundaries in the
> FaxOut transmission."
>> Line 386-389 - call out FaxLogURI as location of durable log
> - per FaxIn review - add sentence to end of section 6.5, last paragraph:
> "Note that FaxLogURI specifies the location of the durable log that is
> REQUIRED for all FaxOutService implementations (see section 7)."
>> Line 409 - call out FaxLogURI as location of durable log
> - change "MUST be durably logged." to:
> "MUST be durably logged to the location specified in FaxLogURI
> (see section 6.5)."
>> Line 509-510 - PSTN Fax multiple document jobs issue
> - per FaxIn review - insert new third sentence in section 8:
> "Note that PSTN FaxOut jobs either: (a) do not support multiple
> documents; or (b) do not distinguish the document boundaries in the
> FaxOut transmission."
>> Line 599-600 - clarity in conformance requirements
> - per FaxIn review - revised first sentence in section 10.2.1
> - change "all of the model objects" to
> "all of the REQUIRED model objects"
>> Line 607-610 - PSTN Fax multiple document jobs issue
> - per FaxIn review - add sentence in section 10.2.2, last paragraph:
> "Note that PSTN FaxOut jobs either: (a) do not support multiple
> documents; or (b) do not distinguish the document boundaries in the
> FaxOut transmission."
>> Line 633-634 - protection of Fax user data issue
> - per FaxIn review - add entire section 14.1 from FaxIn as new section
> 13.1 Protection of End User's FaxOut Data, change "FaxIn" to "FaxOut"
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------**
> **
>> ****
>> ** **
>
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20110815/402fb7dd/attachment-0001.html>