Oh! Ok!
________________________________
From: Michael Sweet [mailto:msweet at apple.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 11:06 AM
To: Petrie, Glen
Cc: Ira McDonald; ipp at pwg.org
Subject: Re: [IPP] (Another) New PWG Raster Format draft posted
Glen, the filename doesn't need to reflect the whole document title.
Also, we'd need to change the charter to reflect the new name.
I really don't see the need to change the filename...
On Apr 26, 2011, at 9:40 AM, Petrie, Glen wrote:
So it should be wd-ipppwgraster
________________________________
From: Ira McDonald [mailto:blueroofmusic at gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 9:35 AM
To: Petrie, Glen; Ira McDonald
Cc: Michael Sweet; ipp at pwg.org
Subject: Re: [IPP] (Another) New PWG Raster Format draft posted
Hi Glen,
No - our PWG Naming Policy requires that the first part
of the filename be the responsible working group.
Cheers,
- Ira
Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP WG
Co-Chair - TCG Hardcopy WG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music/High North Inc
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusichttp://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
<http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc>
mailto:blueroofmusic at gmail.com
Christmas through April:
579 Park Place Saline, MI 48176
734-944-0094
May to Christmas:
PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839
906-494-2434
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Petrie, Glen
<glen.petrie at eitc.epson.com> wrote:
Since the title of document is called the "PWG Rater Format" I believe
we should change the file name to wd-pwgraster10-xxxxx instead of
wd-ippraster10-xxxxx
Glen
-----Original Message-----
From: ipp-bounces at pwg.org [mailto:ipp-bounces at pwg.org] On Behalf Of
Michael Sweet
Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2011 9:37 PM
To: ipp at pwg.org
Subject: [IPP] (Another) New PWG Raster Format draft posted
All,
The previous updated draft of the PWG Raster Format has two whole
subsections accidentally deleted from it... Here is a newer and even
better version with the lost subsections added back in along with the
IANA IPP registration templates for good measure:
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippraster10-20110327-rev.pdfftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippraster10-20110327.pdfftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippraster10-20110327.docx
The -rev version shows the changes from the last "good" version (Feb
23rd)...
________________________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
_______________________________________________
ipp mailing list
ipp at pwg.orghttps://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
_______________________________________________
ipp mailing list
ipp at pwg.orghttps://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
________________________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20110426/4487a3ca/attachment-0001.html>