Glen, the filename doesn't need to reflect the whole document title. Also, we'd need to change the charter to reflect the new name.
I really don't see the need to change the filename...
On Apr 26, 2011, at 9:40 AM, Petrie, Glen wrote:
> So it should be wd-ipppwgraster
>> From: Ira McDonald [mailto:blueroofmusic at gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 9:35 AM
> To: Petrie, Glen; Ira McDonald
> Cc: Michael Sweet; ipp at pwg.org> Subject: Re: [IPP] (Another) New PWG Raster Format draft posted
>> Hi Glen,
>> No - our PWG Naming Policy requires that the first part
> of the filename be the responsible working group.
>> Cheers,
> - Ira
>> Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
> Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
> Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP WG
> Co-Chair - TCG Hardcopy WG
> IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
> Blue Roof Music/High North Inc
>http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic>http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc> mailto:blueroofmusic at gmail.com> Christmas through April:
> 579 Park Place Saline, MI 48176
> 734-944-0094
> May to Christmas:
> PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839
> 906-494-2434
>>>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Petrie, Glen <glen.petrie at eitc.epson.com> wrote:
> Since the title of document is called the "PWG Rater Format" I believe
> we should change the file name to wd-pwgraster10-xxxxx instead of
> wd-ippraster10-xxxxx
>> Glen
>>> -----Original Message-----
> From: ipp-bounces at pwg.org [mailto:ipp-bounces at pwg.org] On Behalf Of
> Michael Sweet
> Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2011 9:37 PM
> To: ipp at pwg.org> Subject: [IPP] (Another) New PWG Raster Format draft posted
>> All,
>> The previous updated draft of the PWG Raster Format has two whole
> subsections accidentally deleted from it... Here is a newer and even
> better version with the lost subsections added back in along with the
> IANA IPP registration templates for good measure:
>>ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippraster10-20110327-rev.pdf>ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippraster10-20110327.pdf>ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippraster10-20110327.docx>> The -rev version shows the changes from the last "good" version (Feb
> 23rd)...
>> ________________________________________________________________________
> Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair
>>> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
>ipp at pwg.org>https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
>ipp at pwg.org>https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>
________________________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20110426/25f65e84/attachment-0001.html>