Re: PMP> Port Mon MIB - Community Name

From: Harry Lewis (harryl@us.ibm.com)
Date: Tue Aug 05 2008 - 18:04:27 EDT

Ron, thanks!

Harry Lewis
Program Manager - Intellectual Property & Open Standards
Phone: 303-924-5337
e-mail: harryl@us.ibm.com
infoprint.com

P Think before you print

Ron.Bergman@ricoh-usa.com
08/05/2008 03:56 PM

To
Harry Lewis/US/InfoPrint/IDE@IBMUS
cc
PMP@pwg.org,
Subject
Re: PMP> Port Mon MIB - Community Name

Harry,

A more appropriate interpretation would be:

"SNMP needs the Community Name" and "for MS the Community Name must be
"public" for the Port Mon MIB"

 
             Harry Lewis
             <harryl@us.ibm.co
             m> To

             Sent by: PMP@pwg.org
             pmp-owner@pwg.org cc

 
                                                                   Subject

             08/05/2008 02:30 PMP> Port Mon MIB - Community Name
             PM
 
 
 
 
 

I accessed the archived report on Port Mon MIB interop testing which
says...

Discussion of use of Community Name
Must be “public” for Port Monitor MIB to work
MS indicated that the Community Name at the logical port level is needed
to
be compatible with the existing applications.

Is it correct to interpret this as "MS needs the Community Name" and "the
Community Name must be "public"?

Regards,
Harry

Harry Lewis
Program Manager - Intellectual Property & Open Standards
Phone: 303-924-5337
e-mail: harryl@us.ibm.com
infoprint.com

(Embedded image moved to file: pic04734.gif)
P Think before you print


picture
pic04734.gif

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Aug 05 2008 - 18:04:35 EDT