Re: PMP> Port Mon MIB - Community Name
From: Ron.Bergman@ricoh-usa.com
Date: Tue Aug 05 2008 - 17:56:19 EDT
- Previous message: Harry Lewis: "PMP> Port Mon MIB - Community Name"
- In reply to: Harry Lewis: "PMP> Port Mon MIB - Community Name"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Harry,
A more appropriate interpretation would be:
"SNMP needs the Community Name" and "for MS the Community Name must be
"public" for the Port Mon MIB"
Harry Lewis
<harryl@us.ibm.co
m> To
Sent by: PMP@pwg.org
pmp-owner@pwg.org cc
Subject
08/05/2008 02:30 PMP> Port Mon MIB - Community Name
PM
I accessed the archived report on Port Mon MIB interop testing which
says...
Discussion of use of Community Name
Must be “public” for Port Monitor MIB to work
MS indicated that the Community Name at the logical port level is needed to
be compatible with the existing applications.
Is it correct to interpret this as "MS needs the Community Name" and "the
Community Name must be "public"?
Regards,
Harry
Harry Lewis
Program Manager - Intellectual Property & Open Standards
Phone: 303-924-5337
e-mail: harryl@us.ibm.com
infoprint.com
(Embedded image moved to file: pic04734.gif)
P Think before you print
- Next message: Harry Lewis: "Re: PMP> Port Mon MIB - Community Name"
- Previous message: Harry Lewis: "PMP> Port Mon MIB - Community Name"
- In reply to: Harry Lewis: "PMP> Port Mon MIB - Community Name"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Aug 05 2008 - 17:56:28 EDT