Hi,
Thanks Bill - right - use multiple instances of (for
instance) a PostScript interpreter to represent each
different Marker - good solution.
Cheers,
- Ira McDonald
-----Original Message-----
From: Wagner,William [mailto:bwagner@digprod.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 10:00 AM
To: 'Schoenbach Andreas'; pmp@pwg.org
Subject: RE: PMP> prtChannelEntry -> prtMarkerIndex
Greetings:
The MIB model assumes that the channel drives the interpreter and the
interpreter somehow drives the marker through the system controller. There
is a relationship between channel and interpreter(s) in the
prtChannelCurrentJobCntlLangIndex, and the
prtChannelDefaultPageDescLangIndex objects. You could define interpreters
with a fixed relationship to each marking engine. This would allow the
dynamic relation between channel and marking engine to be reported.
William A. Wagner (Bill Wagner)
Director of Technology
Imaging Division
NETsilicon, Inc.
781-398-4588
-----Original Message-----
From: Schoenbach Andreas [mailto:Andreas.Schoenbach@abgap.siemens.de]
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 11:11 AM
To: pmp@pwg.org
Subject: PMP> prtChannelEntry -> prtMarkerIndex
Hello,
I have three markers and two channels in my machine.
I need to select which marker is printing the data from a channel.
(like prtChannelDefaultPageDescLangIndex).
Is this relation present or can you extend the mib?
Example:
prtChannelMarkerIndex OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Integer32
MAX-ACCESS read-write
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The value of prtMarkerIndex corresponding to the
Marker for this channel.
This marker defines the default marker to be used for the print
data
from this channel.
Must be 1 or greater. -1 means unknown. -2 means auto-select "
::= { prtChannelEntry 11 }
Thanks,
Andreas.Schoenbach@abgap.siemens.de
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Sep 20 2000 - 15:59:43 EDT