Interop tests are fun, but costly. No, I'd prefer a survey, unless there is no
interest at all.
Harry Lewis - IBM Printing Systems
----- Forwarded by Harry Lewis/Boulder/IBM on 04/30/97 07:49 AM ---
jkm@uscore.underscore.com
04/29/97 06:29 PM
To: Harry Lewis/Boulder/IBM@IBMUS
cc: pmp@pwg.org@internet
Subject: Re: PMP> r/w objects
Harry,
> One thing I don't think we determined very well during interop testing (and I
> wanted to bring up at today's call but ran out of time) is to what extent r/w
> objects have been implemented as r/w vs. r/o. Wouldn't it be important to a
mgt > app to find out NO ONE allows you to WRITE and store in NVRAM the value
of >
prtInputMediaName (for example)?
I take it you're suggesting that the PMP group should perform some sort
of common test(s) on their products. Do you have a specific proposal
in mind to determine the level of implementation consistency?
...jay