IPP Mail Archive: Re: UPD> Re: IPP> min/max custom size v

Re: UPD> Re: IPP> min/max custom size values

From: Mark VanderWiele (markv@us.ibm.com)
Date: Fri Mar 30 2001 - 10:44:11 EST

Next message: Norbert Schade: "Re: IPP> RFC 3092 - Etymology of "foo" - 1 April 2001"

Previous message: McDonald, Ira: "IPP> RFC 3075/3076 - XMI Digital Signatures"
Reply: Norbert Schade: "Re: UPD> Re: IPP> min/max custom size values"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Careful, we may be making the same mistake we made in IPP where the form
size, media type, and tray are returned separately causing user interface
nightmare since all three of these really must be selected together and
represent the actual configuration of the printer. Therefore, I would
propose that when we have settled in on a syntax for the form size, media
type, and tray we go one step further and define a way to join the fields
so that the proper constraints can be represented. Perhaps a simple "+"
character. Again, form size by itself is meaningless.

Regards,
Mark VanderWiele
IBM, Linux Tecnology Center
512-838-4779, t/l 678-4779
MARKV@IBMUS
email: markv@us.ibm.com

Next message: Norbert Schade: "Re: IPP> RFC 3092 - Etymology of "foo" - 1 April 2001"
Previous message: McDonald, Ira: "IPP> RFC 3075/3076 - XMI Digital Signatures"
Reply: Norbert Schade: "Re: UPD> Re: IPP> min/max custom size values"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 30 2001 - 11:32:08 EST