IPP> RFC 3075/3076 - XMI Digital Signatures

• Previous message: McDonald, Ira: "IPP> RFC 3092 - Etymology of "foo" - 1 April 2001"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi folks,

On a _slightly_ more serious note, for updated references in our
IPP Printer Installation spec, see RFC 3075 (XML Digital Signatures)
and RFC 3076 (Canonical XML 1.0). In order to reduce ambiguity and
improve verification of XML digital signatures, canonicalization of
XML should be used.

Note that RFC 3075 introduces the concept of a 'Manifest' which
allows a digital signature to be specified for a non-XML resource
(like the gzip file of a print client).

ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc3075.txt

ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc3076.txt

Cheers,
- Ira McDonald, consulting architect at Sharp and Xerox
  High North Inc

• Next message: Mark VanderWiele: "Re: UPD> Re: IPP> min/max custom size values"
• Previous message: McDonald, Ira: "IPP> RFC 3092 - Etymology of "foo" - 1 April 2001"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 29 2001 - 18:51:39 EST