Exactly! As long as the OID is unique, what does it matter which part
of the tree it is in?
Morteza,
Bruce Greenblatt wrote:
>
> What's wrong with continuing to use the one from Sun? As long as it is
> unambiguous, who cares?
>
> Bruce
>
> At 11:59 AM 4/21/2000 -0600, harryl@us.ibm.com wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >The Internet Printing Protocol Working Group is developing an Internet
> >Draft describing an LDAP Schema for Printer Services.
> >
> >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipp-ldap-printer-schema-00.txt
> >
> >
> >For expediency, the initial draft specifies OIDs from a Sun Microsystems
> >private enterprise subtree. In preparation for a standards track document
> >we would like these OIDs to be routed in a standards subtree. We want to
> >harmonize with any convention that may exist within the LDAP community for
> >registering this subtree. Will the LDAP group make the request for an
> >assigned OID subtree or would you prefer for the IPP group to make the
> >request?
> >
> >Harry Lewis
> >
> >
> >
> ==============================================
> Bruce Greenblatt, Ph. D.
> Directory Tools and Application Services, Inc.
> http://www.directory-applications.com
> Sign up for our LDAP Technical Overview Seminar at:
> http://www.acteva.com/go/dtasi
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 21 2000 - 14:42:08 EDT