Bruce,
It is politically incorrect. We had objections raised in IET47 on this.
Carl-Uno Manros
IETF IPP Chair
-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Greenblatt [mailto:bgreenblatt@directory-applications.com]
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2000 11:26 AM
To: harryl@us.ibm.com; mark.wahl@innosoft.com; ietf-ldapext@netscape.com
Cc: ipp@pwg.org
Subject: IPP> Re: Root OID for IPP Printer Schema
What's wrong with continuing to use the one from Sun? As long as it is
unambiguous, who cares?
Bruce
At 11:59 AM 4/21/2000 -0600, harryl@us.ibm.com wrote:
>
>
>
>The Internet Printing Protocol Working Group is developing an Internet
>Draft describing an LDAP Schema for Printer Services.
>
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipp-ldap-printer-schema-00.t
xt
>
>
>For expediency, the initial draft specifies OIDs from a Sun Microsystems
>private enterprise subtree. In preparation for a standards track document
>we would like these OIDs to be routed in a standards subtree. We want to
>harmonize with any convention that may exist within the LDAP community for
>registering this subtree. Will the LDAP group make the request for an
>assigned OID subtree or would you prefer for the IPP group to make the
>request?
>
>Harry Lewis
>
>
>
==============================================
Bruce Greenblatt, Ph. D.
Directory Tools and Application Services, Inc.
http://www.directory-applications.com
Sign up for our LDAP Technical Overview Seminar at:
http://www.acteva.com/go/dtasi
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 21 2000 - 14:39:56 EDT