IPP Mail Archive: Re: RE: IPP> MOD> Issue 1.19 [REVISITED - charset

Re: RE: IPP> MOD> Issue 1.19 [REVISITED - charset

Carl Kugler (kugler@us.ibm.com)
10 Nov 1998 00:38:08 -0000

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Erik Guttman: "IPP> Re: DIR - Revised text for SLP 'printer:' template - with updated comments"
Previous message: Hugo Parra: "Re: RE: IPP> MOD> Issue 1.19 [REVISITED - charset"
In reply to: Carl Kugler: "Re: RE: IPP> MOD> Issue 1.19 [REVISITED - charset"

>
> Is a message that specifies an operation that the server doesn't support a =
> malformed request?
>
> -Hugo
>

No. But must I use the "attribute-charset" from the request when forming this type of response:

14.1.4.1 client-error-bad-request (0x0400)
The request could not be understood by the IPP object due to malformed syntax (such as the value of a fixed length attribute whose length does not match the prescribed length for that attribute - see the Implementer's Guide [IPP-IIG] section 16.3). The IPP application SHOULD NOT repeat the request without modifications.

I've got to put SOMETHING in the response "attributes-charset" operation attribute. And I could OPTIONALLY have a "status-message" in the response.

-Carl

-----
See the original message at http://www.egroups.com/list/ipp/?start=4857

--
Free e-mail group hosting at http://www.eGroups.com/

Next message: Erik Guttman: "IPP> Re: DIR - Revised text for SLP 'printer:' template - with updated comments"
Previous message: Hugo Parra: "Re: RE: IPP> MOD> Issue 1.19 [REVISITED - charset"
In reply to: Carl Kugler: "Re: RE: IPP> MOD> Issue 1.19 [REVISITED - charset"