We already have printer attributes, why not stick with em'.
Randy
-----Original Message-----
From: don@lexmark.com [SMTP:don@lexmark.com]
Sent: Monday, April 27, 1998 9:48 AM
To: rturner@sharplabs.com
Cc: Ipp@Pwg.Org
Subject: Re: IPP> Using OID access with IPP/SDP
Randy Turner said
>If we were to define another naming scope, say "attributes",
that
reflected
>object-for-object, the data objects that are in our MIBs, then
I would be
>less opposed. To some degree we have already started doing this
that in
the
>existing IPP 1.0 printer object attribute set.
Randy, I can't believe you said this. Is this security by
obscurity? OK,
rather than call them OIDs will pick random series of numbers
separated
by periods (that happen to match the MIB) to identify the
attributes we
want and call them PORN - "Printer Object Random Numbers"
Anyone object?
**********************************************
* Don Wright don@lexmark.com *
* Product Manager, Strategic Alliances *
* Lexmark International *
* 740 New Circle Rd *
* Lexington, Ky 40550 *
* 606-232-4808 (phone) 606-232-6740 (fax) *
**********************************************