>If we were to define another naming scope, say "attributes", that
reflected
>object-for-object, the data objects that are in our MIBs, then I would be
>less opposed. To some degree we have already started doing this that in
the
>existing IPP 1.0 printer object attribute set.
Randy, I can't believe you said this. Is this security by obscurity? OK,
rather than call them OIDs will pick random series of numbers separated
by periods (that happen to match the MIB) to identify the attributes we
want and call them PORN - "Printer Object Random Numbers"
Anyone object?
**********************************************
* Don Wright don@lexmark.com *
* Product Manager, Strategic Alliances *
* Lexmark International *
* 740 New Circle Rd *
* Lexington, Ky 40550 *
* 606-232-4808 (phone) 606-232-6740 (fax) *
**********************************************