...jay
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-- JK Martin | Email: jkm@underscore.com --
-- Underscore, Inc. | Voice: (603) 889-7000 --
-- 41C Sagamore Park Road | Fax: (603) 889-2699 --
-- Hudson, NH 03051-4915 | Web: http://www.underscore.com --
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Turner, Randy wrote:
>
> This wouldn't be changing any technical specs or semantics...just an
> editorial move to isolate functionality. This type of change would make
> it easier to address transport issues without affecting the status or
> advancement of an encoding specification; and vice-versa. It would also
> make it clearer for future IPP-related documents to reference particular
> aspects of IPP, without bringing any additional baggage to have to sort
> through.
>
> Randy
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carl-Uno Manros [SMTP:cmanros@cp10.es.xerox.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 12, 1998 3:44 PM
> To: Turner, Randy; 'ipp@pwg.org'
> Subject: Re: IPP> IPP document set - naming convention(s)
>
> At 03:36 PM 3/12/98 PST, Turner, Randy wrote:
> >
> >Would anyone have any problem(s) splitting the protocol (not
> model)
> >document into two documents?
> >
> >Document 1 would be an encoding document
> >Document 2 would describe how to transport the encoding over
> HTTP 1.1
> >
> >?
> >
> >Randy
> >
>
> Why are we getting all these "bright" ideas after the work is
> supposed to
> be finished? I don't know if we can do the split at this stage.
>
> I expect that we could try to negotiate that with the RFC
> editor, but it
> would mean actually doing another editing run and insert new
> cross-references etc. It would also impact references in all the
> other
> documents.
>
> Carl-Uno
>
> Carl-Uno Manros
> Principal Engineer - Advanced Printing Standards - Xerox
> Corporation
> 701 S. Aviation Blvd., El Segundo, CA, M/S: ESAE-231
> Phone +1-310-333 8273, Fax +1-310-333 5514
> Email: manros@cp10.es.xerox.com