IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP> IPP document set - naming convention(s)

Re: IPP> IPP document set - naming convention(s)

Ira Mcdonald x10962 (imcdonal@eso.mc.xerox.com)
Thu, 12 Mar 1998 16:48:34 PST

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Tom Hastings: "IPP> PRO - Minor typo in example 9.1, "PrintJob" should be"
Previous message: Ira Mcdonald x10962: "Re: IPP> Status code question"
Maybe in reply to: Turner, Randy: "IPP> IPP document set - naming convention(s)"
Next in thread: Jay Martin: "Re: IPP> IPP document set - naming convention(s)"

Hi Randy,

Considering splitting the protocol document (recently renamed
Protocol Encoding and Transport Mappings) into two documents
should definitely be delayed until after our IETF Aread
Directors report the results of IESG last call on IPP/1.0.

My two cents,
- Ira McDonald

PS - I think splitting them makes sense, but only if EACH
transport mapping (http, tcp, smtp) becomes a separate
document.

Next message: Tom Hastings: "IPP> PRO - Minor typo in example 9.1, "PrintJob" should be"
Previous message: Ira Mcdonald x10962: "Re: IPP> Status code question"
Maybe in reply to: Turner, Randy: "IPP> IPP document set - naming convention(s)"
Next in thread: Jay Martin: "Re: IPP> IPP document set - naming convention(s)"