>Paul,
>
>There has to be some process in any standards body working group. We had
>final call for the working group close about a month ago and since then we
>have been working issues raised during final call - not new issues.
>Granted, the IESG has not had final call and really any issues are still
>open as long as we follow that process, it is just that this should have
>come up ealier. Keith has commented that he expected some comments during
>the larger final call time frame.
--- snip, snip ---
>
>Having said all that, I would be willing to consider the following:
>
>Take the time to review a FULL proposal on an XML mapping for IPP on top of
>HTTP POSTs as new encoding rules for version 1.0 of the new
>"application/ipp" MIME media type if the following conditions are true:
>
>1. That you (or someone) can contribute resources to deliver a full
>proposal, distributed to the working group (via the DL) prior to the
>face-to-face meeting on 1/21-22/98.
>
--- snip , snip ---
Scott,
Thanks for your comments.
One thing you got wrong were the dates for the next PWG IPP meeting.
The meeting is actually on Januari 28 and 29.
As I asked Paul in a previous message, can he have a draft for us by January 23,
which would give him two weeks to write it and a couple of days for us to
read it
and get comments on the DL before the meeting.
Carl-Uno