I assume that this does not affect the model and semantics!
Roger K deBry
Senior Technical Staff Member
Architecture and Technology
IBM Printing Systems
email: rdebry@us.ibm.com
phone: 1-303-924-4080
---------------------- Forwarded by Roger K Debry/Boulder/IBM on 01/09/=
98 01:44
PM ---------------------------
ipp-owner@pwg.org on 01/09/98 06:42:40 AM
Please respond to ipp-owner@pwg.org @ internet
To: ipp@pwg.org @ internet
cc:
Subject: IPP> Delay of IPP ratification
This is a formal request that we delay the finalization of the IPP spec=
until we have looked at the possibility of using XML as the protocol fo=
rmat.
I know this is revisiting an old issue but we need to make sure we do t=
he
right thing. When the current format was proposed there was no good met=
hod
for representing structured data in an ASCII data stream. XML is now
available and seem to be the coming wave. I also know that most of the =
new
standards that will come out over the next year will be based around XM=
L
(and protocol specific HTTP commands). By ensuring that we are in the c=
entre
of these standards we will be able to leverage many common tools that w=
ill
emerge to support and manage these protocols.
There will definitely be down-sides so we need to debate this issue - n=
ot
least the investment that some of us have already made in building usin=
g the
current spec.
I think that somebody from MS will be in Hawaii.
Paul Moore
=