I agree with Harry, let's not overlap the agenda items.
I do not anticipate any time required for the Job MIB so that Thursday can
be shared by IPP and SENSE. I assume that Friday is still reserved for
the Finisher MIB.
Ron Bergman
Dataproducts Corp.
On Mon, 5 Jan 1998, Harry Lewis wrote:
> Carl-Uno wrote:
>
> >Don,
> >
> >It turmns out that there are two kinds of things that people would like to
> >discuss in the January IPP meeting:
> >
> >1) Start discussion about various extensions that were left out from IPP 1.0.
> > We may also need to discuss any comments from the IESG.
> >
> >2) Testing and interoperability issues.
> >
> >I would prefer to deal with the first set of disccussions on the already
> >scheduled Wednesday slot, but would like to find out quickly if we could get
> >a room for the testing issue discussions on Thursday. I assume that the
> >second day meeting would be a smaller crowd, with little or no overlap in
> >participation to other PWG activities planned for Thursday.
> >
> >Please let me know ASAP, as people might have to revise their traveling plans.
>
> My interests would overlap. I'd prefer to adjust agendas to fit all topics
> inline.
>
> Harry Lewis - IBM Printing Systems
>