IPP Mail Archive: Re: IPP> MOD - URGENT: Ok to call 2nd printer uri: "printer-map-uri"?

Re: IPP> MOD - URGENT: Ok to call 2nd printer uri: "printer-map-uri"?

Ron Bergman (rbergma@dpc.com)
Thu, 18 Dec 1997 10:08:14 -0800 (Pacific Standard Time)

Tom,

I agree with the other responses that "map" is not a very descriptive (and
could be confusing) term. I would vote for "printer-tls-uri" but the
first ("printer-secure-uri") is still better than "printer-map-uri"

Ron Bergman
Dataproducts Corp.

On Wed, 17 Dec 1997, Tom Hastings wrote:

> In Washington and before, there has been discussion that calling
> the second uri, "printer-secure-uri" makes it sound like the first
> "printer-uri" is not secure. So we've been searching for a better
> term.
>
> Scott and Steve came up with the term (drum roll):
>
> "Mutual Authentication and Privacy (MAP).
>
> So ok to call the second uri Printer attribute: "printer-map-uri"?
>
> It will be put right after the first uri: "printer-uri" secion
> 4.4.2 in the Model document.
>
> SEND COMMENTS TO DL, SO WE CAN FORWARD THE INTERNET-DRAFT THIS WEEK
> TO THE IESG.
>
> Thanks,
> Tom
>
>