RE: IDS> Oct Face-to-face Action Items -- overlooked?

From: Farrell, Lee (Lee.Farrell@cda.canon.com)
Date: Thu Nov 13 2008 - 16:19:34 EST

  • Next message: Nevo, Ron: "RE: IDS> Oct Face-to-face Action Items -- overlooked?"

    Yes, that's what it seemed. In the future Minutes, I'll make the "find
    other contacts" item the ONGOING one.

    Thanks.

    lee

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Randy Turner [mailto:rturner@amalfisystems.com]
    > Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 1:15 PM
    > To: Farrell, Lee
    > Cc: IDS@pwg.org
    > Subject: Re: IDS> Oct Face-to-face Action Items -- overlooked?
    >
    > Hi Lee,
    >
    > The "find other contacts" action item was the action item I
    > was addressing at today's meeting. To summarize from the
    > discussion earlier today, I think Symantec and Microsoft are
    > willing to discuss NEA/TNC potential rollouts. I have
    > "feelers" out to Cisco and Juniper as well and am waiting for
    > a follow-up discussion. I will try and contact one or more
    > of these folks at the IETF Plenary in Minneapolis.
    >
    > Randy
    >
    > On Nov 13, 2008, at 11:53 AM, Farrell, Lee wrote:
    >
    > > Hello everyone,
    > >
    > > After our teleconference today, I noted from the October
    > face-to- face
    > > Minutes that a few Action Items had not been transferred to the
    > > November 6 teleconference Minutes -- and may have "slipped
    > through the
    > > cracks." It appears that some of the items about Microsoft
    > may have
    > > been enveloped in Dave's current set of questions to
    > Microsoft in one
    > > of his Action Items, but I'm not sure that they all were.
    > >
    > > Also, I noted that the first Action Item (Randy's) that we
    > discussed
    > > today had been CLOSED at that meeting. Today we identified it as
    > > "ongoing", but I wonder if the third Action Item below might be the
    > > more appropriate one to reference instead.
    > >
    > > For future discussion and resolution, the items are:
    > >
    > > ACTION: Ron Bergman will send an email to Mike Fenelon and Jerry
    > > Thrasher to query the issue about how to get NAP attributes
    > registered
    > > with Microsoft.
    > >
    > > ACTION: Dave Whitehead will attempt to obtain answers from
    > > Microsoft to the following questions:
    > > . Because there are multiple assessment protocols, is it
    > > conceivable that multiple assessment protocols run simultaneously-
    > > with each requiring independent (i.e., redundant) assessment?
    > >
    > > . How does Microsoft envision the process for remediation?
    > > . Does Microsoft have any plans for a gateway
    > between NAP
    > > and NEA?
    > >
    > > ACTION: Randy Turner will try to find other contacts that would be
    > > willing to work with the PWG to help deploy NEA health assessment.
    > > (Juniper, Symantec, Cisco are suggested candidates.) Is someone
    > > willing to sit down with the PWG and "have discussions"?
    > >
    > >
    > > lee
    > > ===========================
    > > Lee Farrell
    > > Canon Development Americas
    > > 15975 Alton Parkway
    > > Irvine, CA 92618-3731
    > > (949) 932-3163 - voice
    > > (949) 932-3520 - fax
    > > lee.farrell@cda.canon.com
    > > ===========================
    > >
    >
    >


    • application/x-pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Nov 13 2008 - 16:19:41 EST