Re: IDS> Oct Face-to-face Action Items -- overlooked?

From: Randy Turner (rturner@amalfisystems.com)
Date: Thu Nov 13 2008 - 16:14:51 EST

  • Next message: Farrell, Lee: "RE: IDS> Oct Face-to-face Action Items -- overlooked?"

    Hi Lee,

    The "find other contacts" action item was the action item I was
    addressing at today's meeting. To summarize from the discussion
    earlier today, I think Symantec and Microsoft are willing to discuss
    NEA/TNC potential rollouts. I have "feelers" out to Cisco and Juniper
    as well and am waiting for a follow-up discussion. I will try and
    contact one or more of these folks at the IETF Plenary in Minneapolis.

    Randy

    On Nov 13, 2008, at 11:53 AM, Farrell, Lee wrote:

    > Hello everyone,
    >
    > After our teleconference today, I noted from the October face-to-
    > face Minutes that a few Action Items had not been transferred to the
    > November 6 teleconference Minutes -- and may have "slipped through
    > the cracks." It appears that some of the items about Microsoft may
    > have been enveloped in Dave's current set of questions to Microsoft
    > in one of his Action Items, but I'm not sure that they all were.
    >
    > Also, I noted that the first Action Item (Randy's) that we discussed
    > today had been CLOSED at that meeting. Today we identified it as
    > "ongoing", but I wonder if the third Action Item below might be the
    > more appropriate one to reference instead.
    >
    > For future discussion and resolution, the items are:
    >
    > ACTION: Ron Bergman will send an email to Mike Fenelon and Jerry
    > Thrasher to query the issue about how to get NAP attributes
    > registered with Microsoft.
    >
    > ACTION: Dave Whitehead will attempt to obtain answers from
    > Microsoft to the following questions:
    > • Because there are multiple assessment protocols, is it
    > conceivable that multiple assessment protocols run simultaneously—
    > with each requiring independent (i.e., redundant) assessment?
    >
    > • How does Microsoft envision the process for remediation?
    > • Does Microsoft have any plans for a gateway between NAP
    > and NEA?
    >
    > ACTION: Randy Turner will try to find other contacts that would be
    > willing to work with the PWG to help deploy NEA health assessment.
    > (Juniper, Symantec, Cisco are suggested candidates.) Is someone
    > willing to sit down with the PWG and “have discussions”?
    >
    >
    > lee
    > ===========================
    > Lee Farrell
    > Canon Development Americas
    > 15975 Alton Parkway
    > Irvine, CA 92618-3731
    > (949) 932-3163 - voice
    > (949) 932-3520 - fax
    > lee.farrell@cda.canon.com
    > ===========================
    >


    • application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Nov 13 2008 - 16:14:59 EST