Hi Bill,
Here are some additional comments I have, some of which might overlap with
Jerry's:
Line 113-117 Table of Content
Please resolve all the "ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED "
Terminology Section:
<service>DocumentData
- the definition uses the term "Digital Document" which
should also be defined in this section.
JobTicket
- should be removed, it's redundant here because
<service>JobTicket has all detailed definition for a JobTicket.
Element (first occurrence)
- should be removed. The second occurrence of this term
has more detail and is consistent with what's in the current "MFD Overall"
Section 5.2, first paragraph, line 383:
Second sentence: Remove the first, duplicated "the" and replace
with "of".
Section 5.3.4.3, Processing Step 5:
Remove "the" from "a the".
Section 6.3.1, line 625:
Remove "on" from "on in".
Section 6.3.2, line 630:
Is the "System" referring to the MFD System Object and Service, or
simply the entire MFD system? If it's the MFD System Object and Servcie,
we agreed in the last meeting that System object does not have
job-oriented function. Let's change "Each Service and the System" to "Each
Service in the System".
Section 6.3.3, requirement #2:
Remove "the" from "the a".
Section 9, the 2nd sentence:
I think it's better to change it to: "Future MFD services should
consider the local site security policies for
1) the use of industry standard security protocols (e.g.
WS-Security),
2) compliance to Industry securitiy standards for Imanging and
Hardcopy Devices,
in providing the desire level of MFD operational and information
security.
Regards,
-Nancy
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nancy Chen, PWG Vice-Chair
Principal Engineer
Solutions and Technology
Oki Data
2000 Bishops Gate Blvd.
Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054
Phone: (856)222-7006
Email: Nancy.Chen at okidata.comwamwagner at comcast.net
Sent by: pwg-announce-bounces at pwg.org
07/02/2010 05:05 PM
To
pwg-announce at pwg.org
cc
Subject
[Pwg-Announce] Last Call - MFD Service Model Requirements
This is a reminder that the MFD Service Model Requirements document is in
PWG last call, and that this last call nominally expires next week.
Although this is a requirements document rather than a specification,
failure to satisfy the PWG process on this document will act to stall
progress on the multiple MFD Service specifications now being worked on.
We sincerely request that members provide comments on this document or, if
there are no comments, a simple statement that the document has been read.
Many thanks,
The MFD Working Group
----- Original Message -----
From: wamwagner at comcast.net
To: pwg-announce at pwg.org
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 11:33:45 PM
Subject: [Pwg-Announce] Last Call - MFD Service Model Requirements
All,
This is an announcement to begin the Last Call process for the
"Multifunction Device Service Model Requirements" statement. This document
is a "clear statement of requirements for the standard to be produced" and
is required by the PWG Process (
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/general/pwg-process-30.pdf) in conjunction with
generating a standard. There will be, in fact, some ten MFD Service Model
standards. Two of these have had the requirements statements incorporated
in the standard and have already been advanced to PWG Candidate Standard.
The MFD Working Group has decided that an integrated requirements
statement would not only be more efficient, but would best reflect the
consistent approach to modeling the different MFD imaging and ancillary
services. The Last Call will close on Friday July 9.
Please review this document, accessible at
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/mfd/wd/wd-mfdreq10-20100609 and provide your
comments (or statement of no comments) to the MFD mail list (mfd at pwg.org).
As identified in the PWG Process Document, the "requirements statement is
important as it leads to a clear, common understanding of the goals,
provides a guide for developing the standard, and can be used as a final
test to measure the completeness of the resulting specification." All
comments will be addressed and resolved prior to the statement being put
up for ballot. Note that PWG approval of this requirements statement is
required before the remaining MFD specifications can be approved.
Thanks,
Bill Wagner/Peter Zehler
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner , and is
believed to be clean.
_______________________________________________
pwg-announce mailing list
pwg-announce at pwg.orghttps://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/pwg-announce
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
_______________________________________________
pwg-announce mailing list
pwg-announce at pwg.orghttps://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/pwg-announce
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/pwg-announce/attachments/20100709/f6f77673/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/pwg-announce/attachments/20100709/f6f77673/attachment.htm>