Ron wondered where the registration proposals and approvals would be
posted. According to our PWG process white paper reviewed at the 5/20 PWG
meeting, section 7. Maintenance, step 4:
4. To make the status of proposed registrations and clarifications clear to
PWG participants and others, the Maintenance Editor will keep them in the
appropriate sub-directory
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/xxx/DOC/proposed-registrationsftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/xxx/DOC/proposed-clarifications
where xxx is the project and DOC is the base document against which
changes are proposed.
In this case, the xxx is pmp, and the DOC is, say, rfc1759, if we don't
have a new RFC, or the new rfcnnnn for the Draft Printer MIB.
and step 8 says:
8. If, in the opinion of the WG Chair, the Last Call discussions achieve a
consensus of approval, the Maintenance Editor will move the approved
registration or clarification to the appropriate sub-directory for each
project
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/xxx/DOC/approved-registrationsftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/xxx/DOC/approved-clarifications
and announce the approval to the entire PWG via the PWG-ANNOUNCE DL.
In this case, the xxx is pmp, and the DOC is, say, rfc1759, if we don't
have a new RFC for the Draft Printer MIB, or the new rfcnnnn for the Draft
Printer MIB, if we do.
Tom
At 07:42 05/29/1998 PDT, Ron Bergman wrote:
>Paul,
>>Currently the newly registered enums will be posted on the PWG FTP site
>(ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg). I am not sure of the exact URL, but I will
>send a notice out when the last call expires and the enums are approved.
>>Tom Hastings has already posted the new enums that were added to the Job
>MIB.
>>I do not know if an HTTP link is included to this directory.
>>Hope this info helps.
>> Ron Bergman
> Dataproducts Corp.
>>>On Wed, 27 May 1998, Paul Gloger wrote:
>>> Ron,
>>>> Great work, thank you.
>>>> My one comment: Please remind me... Assuming this proposal is approved,
>> where will the result be recorded? In what publicly accessible place does
>> the PWG always maintain the list of approved extensions to the enums?
>>>> Thanks again,
>> Paul
>>>> ---------------------------------------
>> Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 10:37:35 PDT
>> From: Ron Bergman <rbergma at dpc.com>
>> To: pwg-announce at pwg.org>> cc: Lloyd Young <lpyoung at lexmark.com>
>> Subject: PWG-ANNOUNCE> Last Call: New Printer MIB Enums for FIN MIB
>>>> The Finisher MIB has defined several new enumerations to be added to
>> the PrtAlertGroupTC and the PrtMarkerSuppliesTypeTC. These are being
>> added to the Textual Conventions in the Printer MIB, rather than
>> creating new TCs exclusively for the Finisher MIB, because the
>> Finisher MIB is defines as an extension of the Printer MIB and these
>> new enums logically belong within the above named groups.
>>>> This announcement is a last call for comments regarding the addition
>> of these new enumeration values.
>>>> All comments should be directed to the PWG-ANNOUNCE mail list.
>>>> The last call for comments will close on June 12, 1998.
>>>>>> 1. Alert Group enumerations:
>>>> PrtAlertGroupTC ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
>> ....
>>>>>>>>>>>>>