So is "Media" (from page 50 of pwg:pjt) the same as "MediaSizeName"
(from page 51 of pwg:pjt)?
Actually, the reference for MediaSizeName (pwg 5100.5 $8.1) appears to
be wrong. MediaSizeName is also defined in the 5105.1 /pg 35 and has
the same references pwg 5100.5 $8.1. Maybe MediaSizeName is defined
somewhere else.
Glen
________________________________
From: Zehler, Peter [mailto:Peter.Zehler at xerox.com]
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2012 4:57 AM
To: Petrie, Glen; mfd at pwg.org
Subject: RE: [MFD] A couple of question on Job Ticket 2.0
Glen,
The Media element comes from RFC2911, the values from PWG5101.1. I've
added the proper references to the table.
Pete
Peter Zehler
Xerox Research Center Webster
Email: Peter.Zehler at Xerox.com
Voice: (585) 265-8755
FAX: (585) 265-7441
US Mail: Peter Zehler
Xerox Corp.
800 Phillips Rd.
M/S 128-25E
Webster NY, 14580-9701
From: mfd-bounces at pwg.org [mailto:mfd-bounces at pwg.org] On Behalf Of
Petrie, Glen
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 6:36 PM
To: mfd at pwg.org
Subject: RE: [MFD] A couple of question on Job Ticket 2.0
Another question.
Why is media size just called "Media"? I would have MediaSize would be
more descriptive and in fact the reference to pwg5101.1/Section 5 calls
it Media Size. (Maybe there is some history of just using Media.)
Glen
________________________________
From: mfd-bounces at pwg.org [mailto:mfd-bounces at pwg.org]
<mailto:%5bmailto:mfd-bounces at pwg.org%5d> On Behalf Of Petrie, Glen
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2012 1:51 PM
To: mfd at pwg.org
Subject: [MFD] A couple of question on Job Ticket 2.0
Pete (I guess),
Section 6.1.3: Following the other sections; should "ISheetType" be
called "InsertSheetType"
Section 6.1.4: Following the other sections, should "MediaCol" be
called "MediaColType"
Glen
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is
believed to be clean.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is
believed to be clean.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/mfd/attachments/20120106/ff2d3aba/attachment-0002.html>