Hi Mike,
I support changing the 'silicone' keyword defined for "laminating-type" to 'water-resistant'. There is an identical keyword definition for "coating-type" and I support changing that one as well.
Cheers
Smith
/**
Smith Kennedy
HP Inc.
*/
> On Jun 2, 2022, at 1:50 PM, Michael Sweet via ipp <ipp at pwg.org> wrote:
>> Signed PGP part
> All,
>> We had one semi-technical comment for the IPP Finishings 3.0 formal vote concerning the new 'silicone' value for the "laminating-type" member attribute. The commenter suggested changing this to 'water-resistant' in order to better reflect the semantics of the type of lamination as well as making it neutral on which actual material is used to provide water resistance.
>> The consensus in today's IPP workgroup conference call was to make this change, however we also wanted to make sure that the previous 'silicone' value has not yet been deployed.
>> Please respond (privately, if necessary) to let us know whether you have any objections to replacing the "laminating-type" value 'silicone' with 'water-resistant'. If we don't get an objection before June 10, 2022 then we will assume that publication of IPP Finishings 3.0 can proceed as planned.
>> Thank you!
>> ________________________
> Michael Sweet
>>>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20220610/a5586a5a/attachment.sig>