I have no objection to "document-pages", "document-pages-completed", and
"document-pages=completed-current-copy". I will make the changes to the
schema and the PJT specification. (I can always change back if there is
stiff opposition.)
Peter Zehler
Xerox Research Center Webster
Email: Peter.Zehler at Xerox.com
Voice: (585) 265-8755
FAX: (585) 265-7441
US Mail: Peter Zehler
Xerox Corp.
800 Phillips Rd.
M/S 128-25E
Webster NY, 14580-9701
From: Michael Sweet [mailto:msweet at apple.com]
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 12:10 PM
To: Zehler, Peter
Cc: <ipp at pwg.org>
Subject: Re: [IPP] Pages for documents
Pete,
I think we should change the JPS3 name to prevent the collision. In this
case it isn't a problem for the registry, but I can see this causing
confusion in the future.
I propose adding a "document-" prefix to the "pages-[suffix]" Document
Description attributes (e.g. "pages" becomes "document-pages", etc.) to
mirror the "job-" prefix used for the corresponding Job Description
attributes.
Any objections?
On Jun 18, 2012, at 8:49 AM, Zehler, Peter wrote:
All,
Does anyone see any problem with us no longer having a flat namespace in
the PWG model? In my final JPS3 edits I found a collision on "pages".
JPS3 has the "pages" element whose semantics is the number of input
pages and a syntax of integer. The "overrides" element already contains
the "pages" element whose semantics is to identifies one or more output
pages and it is of type RangeOfInt.
Pete
Peter Zehler
Xerox Research Center Webster
Email: Peter.Zehler at Xerox.com
Voice: (585) 265-8755
FAX: (585) 265-7441
US Mail: Peter Zehler
Xerox Corp.
800 Phillips Rd.
M/S 128-25E
Webster NY, 14580-9701
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is
believed to be clean. _______________________________________________
ipp mailing list
ipp at pwg.orghttps://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
________________________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20120618/b0b7e6fe/attachment-0001.html>