Pete,
I think we should change the JPS3 name to prevent the collision. In this case it isn't a problem for the registry, but I can see this causing confusion in the future.
I propose adding a "document-" prefix to the "pages-[suffix]" Document Description attributes (e.g. "pages" becomes "document-pages", etc.) to mirror the "job-" prefix used for the corresponding Job Description attributes.
Any objections?
On Jun 18, 2012, at 8:49 AM, Zehler, Peter wrote:
> All,
> Does anyone see any problem with us no longer having a flat namespace in the PWG model? In my final JPS3 edits I found a collision on “pages”. JPS3 has the “pages” element whose semantics is the number of input pages and a syntax of integer. The “overrides” element already contains the “pages” element whose semantics is to identifies one or more output pages and it is of type RangeOfInt.
> Pete
>>> Peter Zehler
>> Xerox Research Center Webster
> Email: Peter.Zehler at Xerox.com> Voice: (585) 265-8755
> FAX: (585) 265-7441
> US Mail: Peter Zehler
> Xerox Corp.
> 800 Phillips Rd.
> M/S 128-25E
> Webster NY, 14580-9701
>>> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean. _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
>ipp at pwg.org>https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
________________________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20120618/2524aaef/attachment-0001.html>