Hi Randy,
It's not that we don't care about IFax.
It's that all forms of Internet Fax have protocols and IP
ports that would be reported in HCD_Firewall_Setting.
But many businesses and government agencies ALSO
want to close the "back door" of PSTN Fax.
Cheers,
- Ira
Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Blue Roof Music/High North Inc
email: blueroofmusic at gmail.com
winter:
579 Park Place Saline, MI 48176
734-944-0094
summer:
PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839
906-494-2434
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Randy Turner<rturner at amalfisystems.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>> When we came up with this attribute, we include PSTN in the name, which
> means we only care about PSTN fax, and not internet-fax options such as T.38
> or other fully capable iFax features.
> Did we mean to do this? We only care about PSTN? Which I assume to mean
> analog fax?
>> Randy
>>> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>> _______________________________________________
> ids mailing list
>ids at pwg.org>https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ids>
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.