Daniel,
I'm not at the office this week (on vacation). SecurtyAttributes was renamed to SecurityElements (to be more consistent with other PWG SM naming) in the Feb review of the model . My copy of the (old) schemas works fine ("It works on my system"), so I must have sent you an older or incomplete copy. I'll review the file you sent with my current ones and send the proper files when I get a chance.
Joe
________________________________________
From: sm3-bounces at pwg.org [sm3-bounces at pwg.org] on behalf of Manchala, Daniel [Daniel.Manchala at xerox.com]
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 11:52 AM
To: ids at pwg.org
Cc: sm3 at pwg.org
Subject: [SM3] FW: SM3, v2.901: GetSecurityAttributes
Joe,
We have a question on whether you were planning to incorporate the following attributes into the schema and send it to me. I included the changed security .xsd files you sent me into the latest version of the schema, but I might have missed some files.
Thanks,
Daniel.
________________________________________
From: sm3-bounces at pwg.org [sm3-bounces at pwg.org] on behalf of Norbert Schade [Norbert.Schade at conexant.com]
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 7:09 AM
To: Semantic Model 3.0 Workgroup discussion list
Subject: [SM3] SM3, v2.901: GetSecurityAttributes
None of the schemas have a definition of the GetSecurityAttributes children in ServiceOperations:
- GetSecurityAttributesRequest
- GetSecurityAttributesResponse
They may still be defined in another namespace that is not yet referenced.
I guess we need more help from the Security guys in this case.
Norbert
Norbert Schade
Systems Engineer (printing)
Imaging Solutions
Conexant Systems, Inc.
201 Jones Road
Waltham, MA 02451
U.S.A.
Tel: 1-781-370-8929
Email: norbert.schade at conexant.com<mailto:norbert.schade at conexant.com>
_______________________________________________
sm3 mailing list
sm3 at pwg.orghttps://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/sm3
_______________________________________________
sm3 mailing list
sm3 at pwg.orghttps://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/sm3