[IPP] Minutes posted from today's concall[EXTERNAL]

[IPP] Minutes posted from today's concall[EXTERNAL]

Uli Wehner ulrich.wehner at ricoh-usa.com
Tue Oct 20 21:58:37 UTC 2026


I like the bottom one.




Regards



Uli Wehner

ウリ・ヴェーナー
Technical SME, Technology Engineering

SDC Americas

RICOH Digital Services Center



Ricoh USA, Inc.

2405 Commerce Ave NW,

Duluth, GA 30096



________________________________
From: ipp <ipp-bounces at pwg.org> on behalf of Smith Kennedy via ipp <ipp at pwg.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2026 5:26 PM
To: ISTO-PWG Internet Printing Protocol workgroup discussion forum <ipp at pwg.org>; Michael Sweet <msweet at msweet.org>
Cc: Smith Kennedy <smitty.standards at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [IPP] Minutes posted from today's concall[EXTERNAL]

Hi Mike and all,

I'm starting to dig into creating the next draft of IPP Firmware Update Extensions v1.0 so that I can have a draft completed for review at the F2F and also hopefully have my prototype updated as well. I was reviewing what we have in the wiki:

https://github.com/istopwg/ippsample/wiki/Firmware-Updates#second-revision<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/istopwg/ippsample/wiki/Firmware-Updates*second-revision__;Iw!!Iq1d47XejX0!j3ABAHUW_JDGEgEex4CvS4uve-A1UTy99bZAXxSjaA329jXa0S3zY_gcOsVJCx8ffvyYHg0Zo2jSdjc$>

The one thing that bothers me a little is the keyword structures. What has currently been proposed:

'firmware-update-acquiring'
'firmware-update-acquisition-failed'
'firmware-update-validating'
'firmware-update-validation-failed'
'firmware-update-installing'
'firmware-update-installation-failed'
'firmware-update-activating'
'firmware-update-activation-failed'

We changed from 'firmware-update-<PHASE>-in-progress' to 'firmware-update-<PHASE>ing'. This model seems a bit awkward because the "<PHASE>" substring of "<PHASE>ing" differs from the "<PHASE>" substring in "<PHASE>-failed". At the end of the day I don't actually care that much which one we choose but I want to try to avoid another round of string modifications. So should we have the above? Or should we have this?

'firmware-update-acquisition-failed'
'firmware-update-acquisition-in-progress'
'firmware-update-validation-failed'
'firmware-update-validation-in-progress'
'firmware-update-installation-failed'
'firmware-update-installation-in-progress'
'firmware-update-activation-failed'
'firmware-update-activation-in-progress'

WDYT?

Smith



On Oct 8, 2026, at 2:29 PM, Michael Sweet via ipp <ipp at pwg.org> wrote:

All,

I have posted the minutes from today's IPP workgroup conference call to:

   https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/minutes/ippv2-concall-minutes-20261008.pdf<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/minutes/ippv2-concall-minutes-20261008.pdf__;!!Iq1d47XejX0!j3ABAHUW_JDGEgEex4CvS4uve-A1UTy99bZAXxSjaA329jXa0S3zY_gcOsVJCx8ffvyYHg0Zef7Ojkk$>

Our next conference call is on October 24, 2026 at 3pm ET.

________________________
Michael Sweet

_______________________________________________
ipp mailing list
ipp at pwg.org
https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp__;!!Iq1d47XejX0!j3ABAHUW_JDGEgEex4CvS4uve-A1UTy99bZAXxSjaA329jXa0S3zY_gcOsVJCx8ffvyYHg0ZTMOoOkI$>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20261020/37c6a444/attachment.html>


More information about the ipp mailing list