Hi Smith,
I agree with your suggestion. I also agree with Mike that we should
explicitly document
our rationale for the range starting at 0.
We don't have an IPP WG call until 7 July (10 days from now). We can
certainly discuss
this proposal first on that call, if that suits everyone?
Cheers,
- Ira
*Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)*
*Chair - SAE Trust Anchors and Authentication TF*
*Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG*
*Co-Chair - TCG Metadata Access Protocol SG*
*Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WGSecretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer
Working GroupCo-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WGIETF
Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIBBlue Roof Music / High North
Inchttp://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic
<http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic>http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
<http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc>mailto: blueroofmusic at gmail.com
<blueroofmusic at gmail.com>(permanent) PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839
906-494-2434*
On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 9:40 AM Michael Sweet via ipp <ipp at pwg.org> wrote:
> Smith,
>> I'm generally in favor of this, although I want to do a bit more research
> to determine why the current registration has the rangeOfInteger(0,MAX)
> syntax - I have a vague feeling there was a reason for this (tied to MSN's
> roll limits) but we should be consistent and document the reasons for the
> range so there is no confusion going forward.
>>> > On Jun 23, 2022, at 4:50 PM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & IPP Standards)
> via ipp <ipp at pwg.org> wrote:
> >
> > Signed PGP part
> > Greetings,
> >
> > In advance of an erratum resolution in PWG 5100.7 for Issue #113 (
>https://www.pwg.org/dynamo/issues.php?L113+P-1+S-2+I0+E0+Z67+Q), HP Inc.
> is requesting updating the registration of the "media-size" members of
> "media-col-database" and "media-col-ready" to also list the
> "rangeOfInteger" syntax in addition to the current "integer" syntax. HP
> Inc. is also requesting that the definitions specify a lower bounds of 0
> instead of 1 for the "x-dimension" and "y-dimension" members of
> "media-col-database" and "media-col-ready" to match the member definitions
> in the "media-col" Job Template attribute.
> >
> > The current registration listed on pages 58 and 60 of PWG 5100.7-2019
> are:
> >
> > media-col-database (1setOf collection)
> > <Any "media-col" member attribute>
> > media-source-properties (collection)
> > media-source-feed-direction (type2 keyword)
> > media-source-feed-orientation (type2 enum)
> >
> > media-col-ready (1setOf collection)
> > <Any "media-col" member attribute>
> > media-source-properties (collection)
> > media-source-feed-direction (type2 keyword)
> > media-source-feed-orientation (type2 enum)
> >
> > media-size-supported (1setOf collection)
> > x-dimension (integer(1:MAX) | rangeOfInteger(1:MAX))
> > y-dimension (integer(1:MAX) | rangeOfInteger(1:MAX))
> >
> > If HP Inc.'s requests are followed, the IANA IPP Registry would be
> updated like so (changes in red if you can see color):
> >
> > media-col-database (1setOf collection)
> > <Any "media-col" member attribute>
> > media-size (collection)
> > x-dimension (integer(0:MAX) | rangeOfInteger(0:MAX))
> > y-dimension (integer(0:MAX) | rangeOfInteger(0:MAX))
> > media-source-properties (collection)
> > media-source-feed-direction (type2 keyword)
> > media-source-feed-orientation (type2 enum)
> >
> > media-col-ready (1setOf collection)
> > <Any "media-col" member attribute>
> > media-size (collection)
> > x-dimension (integer(0:MAX) | rangeOfInteger(0:MAX))
> > y-dimension (integer(0:MAX) | rangeOfInteger(0:MAX))
> > media-source-properties (collection)
> > media-source-feed-direction (type2 keyword)
> > media-source-feed-orientation (type2 enum)
> >
> > media-size-supported (1setOf collection)
> > x-dimension (integer(0:MAX) | rangeOfInteger(0:MAX))
> > y-dimension (integer(0:MAX) | rangeOfInteger(0:MAX))
> >
> >
> > Doing this registration sooner rather than later will help systems that
> generate code from the IANA IPP Registry, such as "jipp".
> >
> > Let me know if there are any objections to this registration via email
> or we can discuss at the next IPP Workgroup call.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Smith
> >
> > /**
> > Smith Kennedy
> > HP Inc.
> > */
> >
> >
> >
>> ________________________
> Michael Sweet
>> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
>ipp at pwg.org>https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20220627/3bb22b2b/attachment.html>