[IPP] Updated draft of Job Accounting best practice posted

[Rizzo, Christopher]

I guess the email I sent yesterday with the attached Excel Spreadsheet may have been a bit of overkill, given the succinctness of this IPP Accounting spec (referring to section 4.3).   d:o)

Not sure my email had much influence then...  Also not sure where to go from here or if more input is requested of me.  I do think it's fair that one could say section 4.3 (which I agree is very well written) mainly covers what was in the spreadsheet I sent.

IPP Accounting spec does not mention legacy client issues you asked about however?  Is that as planned or overlooked?

Thanks,
Chris

Christopher Rizzo
Xerox Corporation
GDG/Discovery/Advance Technology
26600 SW Parkway Ave.
Wilsonville, OR 97070-9251
Phone: (585) 314-6936
Email: Christopher.Rizzo at xerox.com

"The realization came over me with full force that a good part of the remainder of my life was going to be spent in finding errors in my own programs."
-Maurice Wilkes, Memoirs of a Computer Pioneer

From: ipp <ipp-bounces at pwg.org> on behalf of PWG Workgroup <ipp at pwg.org>
Reply-To: Michael Sweet <msweet at msweet.org>
Date: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 at 12:49 PM
To: PWG Workgroup <ipp at pwg.org>
Subject: [IPP] Updated draft of Job Accounting best practice posted

All,

I have posted an updated interim draft of the Job Accounting with IPP v1.0 best practice document to:

                https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippaccounting10-20200129.docx
                https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippaccounting10-20200129.pdf
                https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippaccounting10-20200129-rev.pdf

________________________
Michael Sweet



_______________________________________________
ipp mailing list
ipp at pwg.org<mailto:ipp at pwg.org>
https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20200129/e9d21aa4/attachment.html>