[IPP] RFC: print-quality-percent (integer(0:100))

[Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & Standards Architect)]

Hi Mike,

The only problem I see is that vendor- or site-defined print quality values, printer vendors likely want labels that can at least uniquely identify the additional settings, and that could have corresponding _tooltip and _helpurl content.

Smith

/**
    Smith Kennedy
    HP Inc.
*/

> On Aug 28, 2019, at 1:33 PM, Michael Sweet via ipp <ipp at pwg.org> wrote:
> 
> All,
> 
> As an alternative to adding more (out of order) enum values to print-quality, how about a print-quality-percent (integer(0:100)) attribute where:
> 
> - print-quality-percent='25' maps to print-quality='3' (draft),
> - print-quality-percent='50' maps to print-quality='4' (normal), and
> - print-quality-percent='75' maps to print-quality='5' (high5)
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> ________________________
> Michael Sweet
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
> ipp at pwg.org
> https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp <https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/IvxiC2kr5rfp2N1mkU1hC1u?domain=pwg.org>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20190828/bdea3b45/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20190828/bdea3b45/attachment.sig>