Hi Mike,
+1.
Except that we want to be able to (and have already) marked *operations*
(and not just attributes) as DEPRECATED.
Cheers,
- Ira
Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG
Co-Chair - TCG Metadata Access Protocol SG
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusichttp://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
mailto: blueroofmusic at gmail.com
PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839 906-494-2434
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 2:27 PM Michael Sweet via ipp <ipp at pwg.org> wrote:
> All,
>> Here is my proposed text for deprecations and obsoletions in the
> conformance section of new IPP specifications:
>> The term DEPRECATED is used for previously defined and approved
> items that SHOULD NOT be used or implemented. The term OBSOLETED is used
> for previously defined and approved items that MUST NOT be used or
> implemented.
>>> Thoughts?
>> _________________________________________________________
> Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer
>> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
>ipp at pwg.org>https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20190307/f030e9cc/attachment.html>