[Issue Unconfirmed]
Section 3.1 says:
3.1 Rationale for IPP Transaction-Based Printing Extensions
Given the following existing specifications and the need for a standard
method
supporting Transaction-Based Printing without vendor-specific driver
software, the IP
Transaction-Based Printing Extensions specification should:
1. Use existing the existing IPP specfications to support job submission to
and monitoring of Paid Imaging Services...
Item #1 should rather read:
"1. Use existing IPP specifications"
to remove the redundant "existing" and fix the spelling of
"specifications".
Link: http://www.pwg.org/issues/73