Hi Ira,
If the template had the IANA section included and the relevant data was simply not added, then I completely agree with your earlier suggestion to include the item in the last call comments.
Thanks.
Best Regards,
/Paul
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 17, 2017, at 11:15 AM, Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Paul,
>> Several comments:
>> 1) The IANA section was NOT missing in the template.
> 2) The PWG Process for IPP Registrations is work-in-progress in SC.
> 3) This is a WG last call, NOT a PWG last call.
> 4) Stop, revise, and restart is a slippery slope that does not have any
> existing PWG Process 3.0 sanction for WG last call.
>> Cheers,
> - Ira
>>> Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
> Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG
> Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
> Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
> Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WG
> IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
> Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
>http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic>http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc> mailto: blueroofmusic at gmail.com> Jan-April: 579 Park Place Saline, MI 48176 734-944-0094
> May-Dec: PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839 906-494-2434
>>>> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Paul Tykodi <ptykodi at tykodi.com> wrote:
>> Hi Smith,
>>>> Since we missed a required section in the template, I personally like the re-publish and re-start option as opposed to considering it as a last call comment.
>>>> Generally I am seeing this as a process failure (i. e. template used was missing a required section) rather than a content related issue.
>>>> I realize adding the section into the document adds content so I think either proposed solution will work fine within PWG process rules.
>>>> Thanks.
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>> /Paul
>>>> P.S. - Thanks Mike for catching this issue.
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>> On Nov 17, 2017, at 10:02 AM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless & Standards Architec) <smith.kennedy at hp.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Wow, I wonder how I missed that too! I can hammer out another revision and we can re-issue the last call. Or we can just treat this as conventional last call feedback. Which do you and the IPP WG prefer?
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>> Smith
>>> ---
>>>>>> Smith Kennedy
>>> Wireless Architect - Client Software - IPG-PPS
>>> Standards - PWG / Bluetooth SIG / Wi-Fi Alliance / NFC Forum
>>> Chair, IEEE ISTO Printer Working Group
>>> HP Inc.
>>>>>>>>> On Nov 17, 2017, at 6:34 AM, Michael Sweet <msweet at apple.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> One Apple comment: there is no IANA Considerations section! (and I don't believe I missed this with all of the reviews we did!)
>>>>>>>> You'll need two subsections to register the new operation and its corresponding value, to insert before the current section 8 (references) - the current reg-template.docx has the necessary text you can copy from:
>>>>>>>> N IANA Considerations
>>>>>>>>>>>> N.1 Type2 enum Registrations
>>>>>>>> The attributes defined in this registration will be published by IANA according to the procedures in IPP Model and Semantics [RFC8011] section 7.1 in the following file:
>>>>>>>>http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipp-registrations>>>>>>>> The registry entries will contain the following information:
>>>>>>>> Attributes (attribute syntax)
>>>> Enum Value Enum Symbolic Name Reference
>>>> ---------- ------------------ ---------
>>>> operations-supported (1setOf type2 enum) [RFC8011]
>>>> 0x0066 Get-User-Printer-Attributes [IPPGUPA]
>>>>>>>>>>>> N.2 Operation Registrations
>>>>>>>> The attributes defined in this registration will be published by IANA according to the procedures in IPP/1.1 Model and Semantics [RFC8011] section 7.4 in the following file:
>>>>>>>>http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipp-registrations>>>>>>>> The registry entries will contain the following information:
>>>>>>>> Operation Name Reference
>>>> -------------- ---------
>>>> Get-User-Printer-Attributes [IPPGUPA]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 16, 2017, at 10:25 PM, Michael Sweet <msweet at apple.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> All,
>>>>>>>>>> This message begins the IPP Last Call of the IPP Get-User-Printer-Attributes registration which is available at the following URLs:
>>>>>>>>>>https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippgupa-20171117.pdf>>>>>https://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippgupa-20171117.odt>>>>>>>>>> Please review this registration and respond to the IPP mailing list (reply-all to this message is fine) with any feedback you have for the proposed registration.
>>>>>>>>>> This IPP Last Call ends at 10pm PT on December 1, 2017.
>>>>>>>>>> _________________________________________________________
>>>>> Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> ipp mailing list
>>>>>ipp at pwg.org>>>>>https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>>>>>>>> _________________________________________________________
>>>> Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> ipp mailing list
>>>>ipp at pwg.org>>>>https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ipp mailing list
>>>ipp at pwg.org>>>https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>>>> _______________________________________________
>> ipp mailing list
>>ipp at pwg.org>>https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>>>-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20171117/2b154cfe/attachment.html>