Hi Mike,
Thanks.
AFAIK there will never be a Document attributes group in a System Service
operation?
Having the Resource attributes and then System attributes last in all the
applicable
operations should simplify the edits a bit.
Cheers,
- Ira
Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusichttp://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
mailto: blueroofmusic at gmail.com
Jan-April: 579 Park Place Saline, MI 48176 734-944-0094
May-Dec: PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839 906-494-2434
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 7:29 PM, Michael Sweet <msweet at apple.com> wrote:
> Ira,
>> The order should match the tag values, so if system-attributes-tag ends up
> as 0x0a (next open slot) then it needs to come after all other attribute
> groups (at the end).
>> FWIW, the resource-attributes-tag value will be 0x08 (from the original
> ipp-get-resources drafts) so resource attributes will come before document
> attributes (0x09) and system attributes (0x0a) but after all others.
>>> > On May 15, 2017, at 6:55 PM, Ira McDonald <blueroofmusic at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > Bottom line - does that mean it's OK and appropriate to have the System
> attributes
> > group (for System status changes from Printer operations) at the *end*
> (last) of the
> > response attribute groups?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > - Ira
> >
> >
> > Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
> > Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG
> > Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
> > Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
> > Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WG
> > IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
> > Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
> > http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusic> > http://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc> > mailto: blueroofmusic at gmail.com> > Jan-April: 579 Park Place Saline, MI 48176 734-944-0094
> > May-Dec: PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839 906-494-2434
> >
> >
> > On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 6:13 PM, Michael Sweet <msweet at apple.com> wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > Re: my pending action item:
> >
> > Action: Mike to check on group ordering restrictions in CUPS
> (PENDING)
> >
> > I have the following information to provide:
> >
> > 1. The CUPS scheduler (cupsd) enforces the RFC 8011 group ordering in
> IPP requests.
> >
> > 2. The ipptool utility enforces the RFC 8011 group ordering in IPP
> responses.
> >
> > 3. The CUPS library (libcups) does not enforce the RFC 8011 group
> ordering for requests or responses.
> >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________
> > Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ipp mailing list
> > ipp at pwg.org> > https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp> >
>> _________________________________________________________
> Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer
>>-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20170515/d57c5dd3/attachment.html>