[IPP] IPP] Xerox has reviewed the IPP Finishings 2.1 specification and has comments

[IPP] IPP] Xerox has reviewed the IPP Finishings 2.1 specification and has comments

Kennedy, Smith (Wireless Architect) smith.kennedy at hp.com
Mon Dec 12 20:18:23 UTC 2016


Thanks Jeremy!

Smith



> On Dec 12, 2016, at 12:40 PM, Reitz, Jeremy L <Jeremy.Reitz at xerox.com> wrote:
> 
>  
> 1)      Section 3.3.3 explicitly discusses ordering of options yet in 3.4 Out of Scope #1 claims the opposite.
> 2)      Line 439 “any of the Subunits of the Printer” IPP finishings can be performed off line finishers
> 3)      Line 731-734 – This best practice convention should be codified across all IPP
>  
> Thanks,
> Jeremy Reitz
> Development Manager
> Xerox Corporation
> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
> ipp at pwg.org <mailto:ipp at pwg.org>
> https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp <https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20161212/5149f626/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4241 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20161212/5149f626/attachment.p7s>


More information about the ipp mailing list
Our website uses cookies on your device to give you the best user experience. By using our website, you agree to the placement of these cookies. To learn more, read our privacy policy. Read Privacy Policy