[IPP] IPP] Xerox has reviewed the IPP Finishings 2.1 specification and has comments

[Kennedy, Smith (Wireless Architect)]

Thanks Jeremy!

Smith



> On Dec 12, 2016, at 12:40 PM, Reitz, Jeremy L <Jeremy.Reitz at xerox.com> wrote:
> 
>  
> 1)      Section 3.3.3 explicitly discusses ordering of options yet in 3.4 Out of Scope #1 claims the opposite.
> 2)      Line 439 “any of the Subunits of the Printer” IPP finishings can be performed off line finishers
> 3)      Line 731-734 – This best practice convention should be codified across all IPP
>  
> Thanks,
> Jeremy Reitz
> Development Manager
> Xerox Corporation
> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
> ipp at pwg.org <mailto:ipp at pwg.org>
> https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp <https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20161212/5149f626/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4241 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20161212/5149f626/attachment.p7s>