Hi,
Maybe "stitching-method"? I find "kind" a little vague.
Cheers,
- Ira
Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG Internet Printing Protocol WG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music / High North Inc
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusichttp://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
mailto: blueroofmusic at gmail.com
Winter 579 Park Place Saline, MI 48176 734-944-0094
Summer PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839 906-494-2434
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Kennedy, Smith (Wireless Architect) <
smith.kennedy at hp.com> wrote:
>>> On 2016-04-14, at 2:32 PM, Michael Sweet <msweet at apple.com> wrote:
>> 5. New Section 6.x stitching-type-supported (1setOf type2 keyword)
>> The "stitching-type-supported" Printer attribute lists the supported
> values for the "stitching-type" (section 5.2.12.5) member attribute.
>>> Note: JDF has a "stitching type" with values "corner", "saddle", and
> "side". Perhaps we should use the name "stitching-kind" instead to avoid
> confusion (since JDF doesn't currently support crimping/eco-staples)???
>>> I don't have a problem calling it "stitching-kind". Any objections from
> anybody else? Rick / Ira / Bill?
>> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
>ipp at pwg.org>https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>>-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20160415/8d035a7a/attachment.html>