Hi there,
At HP Inc. we have observed a phenomenon with the "finishings-col-database" similar to the "media-col-database": it can be quite large, and including it in with the rest of the job template attributes for each Get-Printer-Attributes response can have a negative impact on response times. Would it be reasonable or acceptable to make it so that "finishings-col-database" was withheld from Get-Printer-Attributes responses unless it was explicitly named in the "requested-attributes" attribute included in the IPP request? The "finishings-col-ready" could be included by default, but no the full database.
We can discuss this in person next week but I wanted to front load the topic. I wasn't prepared to mention it in today's slide review and didn't want it to belabor the slide review process.
Thanks for your thoughts,
Smith
/**
Smith Kennedy
Wireless Architect - Client Software - IPG-PPS
Standards - IEEE ISTO PWG / Bluetooth SIG / Wi-Fi Alliance / NFC Forum / USB IF
PWG Chair
HP Inc.
*/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20160201/0018c964/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4956 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20160201/0018c964/attachment.p7s>