Hi,
Thanks Mike!
RFC 3382 was simply one of the many IPP RFCs delayed in IETF process.
Cheers,
- Ira
Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Secretary - IEEE-ISTO Printer Working Group
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP WG
Co-Chair - TCG Trusted Mobility Solutions WG
Chair - TCG Embedded Systems Hardcopy SG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music/High North Inc
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusichttp://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
mailto:blueroofmusic at gmail.com
Winter 579 Park Place Saline, MI 48176 734-944-0094
Summer PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839 906-494-2434
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Michael R Sweet <msweet at apple.com> wrote:
> Pete,
>> I'll post an errata for 3382.
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> On Nov 8, 2011, at 8:48 AM, "Zehler, Peter" <Peter.Zehler at xerox.com>
> wrote:
>> Mike,****
>> ** **
>> I know it’s confusing; it confused some people here. One thing, other
> than the inconsistent differences, that contributed to their confusion was
> that RFC3382 was publish in September of 2002 and PWG5100.3 was published
> in February of 2001. Their initial assumption was that newer spec should
> be correct. They did not read the fine print in section 5 that indicates
> the definitions are informative. Furthermore there is no reference,
> normative or informative, that points to the official definition.****
>> ** **
>> I’d like to see the 6 mistakes in rfc3382 corrected. It might also be a
> good idea to include at least an informative reference to PWG5100.3.****
>> ** **
>> Pete****
>> ** **
>> ** **
>> Peter Zehler
>> Xerox Research Center Webster
> Email: Peter.Zehler at Xerox.com> Voice: (585) 265-8755
> FAX: (585) 265-7441
> US Mail: Peter Zehler
> Xerox Corp.
> 800 Phillips Rd.
> M/S 128-25E
> Webster NY, 14580-9701 ****
>> ** **
>> *From:* Michael Sweet [mailto:msweet at apple.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, November 08, 2011 11:26 AM
> *To:* Zehler, Peter
> *Subject:* Re: [IPP] media-size unit problem in rfc3382****
>> ** **
>> Pete,****
>> ** **
>> The media-col definition in 3382 was informative and never registered.****
>> ** **
>> (and yes this is confusing)****
>> ** **
>> On Nov 8, 2011, at 4:31 AM, Zehler, Peter wrote:****
>>>> ****
>> All,****
>> The units for media-size in rfc3382 are incorrect. The examples in
> rfc3382 are inconsistent. It is my understanding that current
> implementations from multiple vendors use hundredth of a millimeter.****
>> ****
>> Rfc3382:****
>> 3.1 4a – example is in mm****
>> 5.1.2.1 – defines units as inches****
>> 5.1.2.2 - defines units as inches****
>> 7.2 – example in inches****
>> Appendix A – example in inches****
>> Appendix B – example in inches****
>> ****
>> PWG5100.3:****
>> 3.13.8.1 - defines units as hundredths of a millimeter****
>> 3.13.8.1 - defines units as hundredths of a millimeter****
>> 3.13.8.3.1 - defines units as hundredths of a millimeter****
>> 3.13.8.3.2 - defines units as hundredths of a millimeter****
>> ****
>> PWG5105.1:****
>> 7.1 - defines units as hundredths of a millimeter (references 5100.3)****
>> ****
>> PWG5108.1:****
>> 4.3.1 – does not call out unit but references 5100.3****
>> 5.2.1 - defines units as hundredths of a millimeter (references 5100.3)***
> *
>> ****
>> ****
>> ****
>> ****
>> Peter Zehler
>> Xerox Research Center Webster
> Email: Peter.Zehler at Xerox.com> Voice: (585) 265-8755
> FAX: (585) 265-7441
> US Mail: Peter Zehler
> Xerox Corp.
> 800 Phillips Rd.
> M/S 128-25E
> Webster NY, 14580-9701****
>> ****
>>> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean. _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
>ipp at pwg.org>https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp****>> ** **
>> __________________________________________________****
>> Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair****
>> ** **
>>> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean.
>> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
>ipp at pwg.org>https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>>
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20111108/125afba2/attachment-0001.html>