Hi Mike,
Yes - it looks like a bug to me too.
We should look through RFC 2911 to see if there are other
complex "xxx-supported" capabilities attributes that didn't
get originally registered correctly in IANA IPP Registry.
Cheers,
- Ira
Ira McDonald (Musician / Software Architect)
Chair - Linux Foundation Open Printing WG
Co-Chair - IEEE-ISTO PWG IPP WG
Chair - TCG Embedded Systems Hardcopy SWG
IETF Designated Expert - IPP & Printer MIB
Blue Roof Music/High North Inc
http://sites.google.com/site/blueroofmusichttp://sites.google.com/site/highnorthinc
mailto:blueroofmusic at gmail.com
Christmas through April:
579 Park Place Saline, MI 48176
734-944-0094
May to Christmas:
PO Box 221 Grand Marais, MI 49839
906-494-2434
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Michael Sweet <msweet at apple.com> wrote:
> All (particularly Ira... :),
>> Looks like the IANA registration for number-up-supported is messed up. It
> currently just says:
>> Job Templatenumber-up-supportedinteger(1:MAX)[RFC2911<http://www.iana.org/go/rfc2911>
> ]but it should be:
>> Job Templatenumber-up-supported1setOf (integer(1:MAX) |
> rangeOfInteger(1:MAX))[RFC2911 <http://www.iana.org/go/rfc2911>]
> __________________________________________________
> Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair
>>> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean.
>> _______________________________________________
> ipp mailing list
>ipp at pwg.org>https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp>>
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20110914/3f8c85d8/attachment-0001.html>