Since the title of document is called the "PWG Rater Format" I believe
we should change the file name to wd-pwgraster10-xxxxx instead of
wd-ippraster10-xxxxx
Glen
-----Original Message-----
From: ipp-bounces at pwg.org [mailto:ipp-bounces at pwg.org] On Behalf Of
Michael Sweet
Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2011 9:37 PM
To: ipp at pwg.org
Subject: [IPP] (Another) New PWG Raster Format draft posted
All,
The previous updated draft of the PWG Raster Format has two whole
subsections accidentally deleted from it... Here is a newer and even
better version with the lost subsections added back in along with the
IANA IPP registration templates for good measure:
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippraster10-20110327-rev.pdfftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippraster10-20110327.pdfftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/wd-ippraster10-20110327.docx
The -rev version shows the changes from the last "good" version (Feb
23rd)...
________________________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
_______________________________________________
ipp mailing list
ipp at pwg.orghttps://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.