I still disagree that we, the PWG, are doing "imaging"; that's what
cameras do. We do print, scan, fax and copy. In today's world of
computer programming is the amount of space to define
"print-color-color" and "scan-color-mode" that wasteful and having the
two provides more understanding to either a source device or a target
device.
Glen
-----Original Message-----
From: ipp-bounces at pwg.org [mailto:ipp-bounces at pwg.org] On Behalf Of
Michael Sweet
Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 1:53 PM
To: ipp at pwg.org
Subject: [IPP] "print-color-mode" or "imaging-color-mode"?
All,
If we consider scanning and printing of forms, the "bi-level"
(threshold) mode makes sense for both. Do we want to rename
"print-color-mode" to "imaging-color-mode" in anticipation of using is
for other MFD services in IPP?
________________________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
_______________________________________________
ipp mailing list
ipp at pwg.orghttps://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.