[IPP] Initial draft of IPPS URI Scheme (25 August 2010)

[Zehler, Peter]

Is it legal for two or more printer-uri-supported to differ only in the
URI scheme?


Peter Zehler

Xerox Research Center Webster
Email: Peter.Zehler at Xerox.com
Voice: (585) 265-8755
FAX: (585) 265-7441
US Mail: Peter Zehler
Xerox Corp.
800 Phillips Rd.
M/S 128-25E
Webster NY, 14580-9701 


-----Original Message-----
From: ipp-bounces at pwg.org [mailto:ipp-bounces at pwg.org] On Behalf Of Ira
McDonald
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 2:53 PM
To: ipp at pwg.org; Michael R Sweet; Ira McDonald
Subject: [IPP] Initial draft of IPPS URI Scheme (25 August 2010)

Hi,

I've just posted an Initial draft of IPPS URI Scheme:

 
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/draft-mcdonald-ipps-uri-scheme-00-20100
825.txt
  - plaintext Internet-Draft format (w/ explicit formfeeds)

 
ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/ipp/wd/draft-mcdonald-ipps-uri-scheme-00-20100
825.htm
  - HTML w/ live table of contents

Hint:  You can view and print the plaintext file easily with
MS WordPad.

We agreed to do an IPP WG review first before submitting
this document to the IETF Internet-Drafts Editor.

This document was created by rewriting IPP URI Scheme
[RFC3510].

Comments?

Cheers,
- Ira (IPPS URI Scheme co-editor)

-----------------------------------------------------
Change Log

25 August 2010 - draft-mcdonald-ipps-uri-scheme-00.txt
- Editorial - complete rewrite of RFC 3510 for new transport binding
- Technical - added section 3.2 IPP over HTTP Transport Binding
- Technical - added section 3.3 IPP over HTTPS Transport Binding
- Editorial - updated Appendix A w/ registration template from RFC 4395

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

_______________________________________________
ipp mailing list
ipp at pwg.org
https://www.pwg.org/mailman/listinfo/ipp

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.