My comments are inline below
Peter Zehler
Xerox Research Center Webster
Email: Peter.Zehler at Xerox.com
Voice: (585) 265-8755
FAX: (585) 265-7441
US Mail: Peter Zehler
Xerox Corp.
800 Phillips Rd.
M/S 128-25E
Webster NY, 14580-9701
From: Tom Hastings [mailto:tom.hastings at verizon.net]
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 1:11 AM
To: Zehler, Peter; ipp at pwg.org; mfd at pwg.org; cloud at pwg.org
Subject: RE: [IPP] Attributes needed for Cloud Printing and definition
inconsistencies [4 questions about the representation of the values]
Pete,
I have 4 questions about your proposed IPP attributes for Geo Location
for Cloud Printing:
1. The representation of the values of your proposed IPP "size",
"horizontal-precision", and "vertical-precision" attributes are
completely different from the representation of the same attributes in
RFC1876.
<PZ>I made a mistake in my values. I used 8 bit unsigned integers
instead of 4 bit. The values should be; Size= 18 (0x12),
HorizontalPrecision=34 (0x22), VerticalPrecision=34 (0x22). (This is
why I really don't like this representation. That and the fact that for
the dimensions associated with MFDs it is not as precise a expressing it
in simple centimeters)</PZ>
If this difference is intentional, it would be good to explain the
difference and why and to indicate this intended difference in the spec?
As I read RFC 1876, the representation of the SIZE, HORIZ PRE, and VERT
PRE attributes are all using this funny SIZE representation as a pair of
four-bit unsigned integers, where the most significant 4-bit unsigned
integer represents the base and the second 4-bit integer represents the
power of 10 by which to multiple the base, sort of a compressed floating
point representation, but using power of 10, not power of 2. The reason
give in RFC 1876 is so that the value is more easily human readable.
HORIZ PRE and VERT PRE attributes defined in RFC 1876, say:
expressed using the same representation as SIZE
i.e., using this same 8-bit "floating point" representation.
BTW, the VERT PRE attribute has an ironic Freudian slip typo in RFC
1876, since I don't find this representation very sane L:
expressed using the sane representation as for SIZE
2. The definitions on the <http://pwg-wiki.wikispaces.com/Geolocation>
appear to be part of the PWG Semantic Model:
This page proposes an IPP collection representing the DNS LOC data
defined in RFC 1876 <http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1876.txt> .
printer-geo-location (collection)
The "printer-geo-location" attribute provides the physical location of
the printer. The collection has the following member attributes.
size (integer (0:MAX))
Diameter of enclosing sphere for printer in centimeters. 0 represents
any size less than one centimeter.
horizontal-precision (integer (0:MAX))
The circle of error of the latitude and longitude measurement in
centimeters. 0 represents an error of less than one centimeter.
vertical-precision (integer(0:MAX))
The circle of error of the altitude measurement in centimeters. 0
represents an error of less than one centimeter.
latitude (integer(-324000000:324000000))
The latitude in thousandths of arc seconds from the equator. 0
represents the equator, positive values represent locations North of the
equator, and negative values represent locations South of the equator.
longitude (integer(-648000000:648000000))
The longitude in thousandths of arc seconds from the prime meridian. 0
represents the prime meridian, positive values represent locations East
of the meridian, and negative values represent locations West of the
meridian.
altitude (integer(-100000:MAX))
The distance in centimeters from the WGS-84 ellipsoid to the center of
the enclosing sphere defined by the "side" member attribute. 0
represents the WGS-84 ellipsoid height, positive values represent
locations above the ellipsoid, and negative values represent locations
below the ellipsoid.
The PWG SM definitions appear to use signed 32-bit integer notation and
description which have the same bit representation as the unsigned
32-bit integer notation and description in RFC 1876, right? Why change
to use the unsigned integer notation and descriptions, when the rest of
the SM and IPP use signed integer notations and descriptions?
<PZ>To the best of my knowledge printer-geo-location is not part of the
PWG semantic model yet. I put out this mail note to test my
understanding of the proposal on the wiki site. I want to be sure the
semantics and syntax are well defined and the mapping to rfc1876 is
clear.</PZ>
3. What is the relationship between Cloud Printing (which these
definitions are proposed for) and IPP Everywhere?
<PZ>Cloud Printing can be implemented without IPP Everywhere. The
initial implementations will not be using IPP or IPP Everywhere. It
will be cobbled together with existing technologies used in Web
Services, messaging protocols, standard document formats and print
driver related technologies. IPP could play a role in this environment
but I believe it is most critical to obtain semantic alignment between
IPP and the emerging Cloud Printing technologies. IPP Everywhere
addresses a number of IPP shortcomings such as printer discovery, common
document formats, and interoperable security. IPP Everywhere could
apply to Cloud Printing but would require some extensions to accommodate
intervening firewalls.</PZ>
4. I like the idea used in IPP and the SM to have the data type indicate
the range of values in the definition of the attribute name and
attribute syntax, i.e., latitude (integer(-324000000:324000000)). Why
isn't this technique of specifying the data type and the data type range
used in your proposal for attributes needed for Cloud Printing?
<PZ>Added to definitions below.</PZ>
Tom
________________________________
From: ipp-bounces at pwg.org [mailto:ipp-bounces at pwg.org] On Behalf Of
Zehler, Peter
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 11:48
To: ipp at pwg.org; mfd at pwg.org
Subject: [IPP] Attributes needed for Cloud Printing and definition
inconsistencies
Job Identifiers:
*existing*
job-id (SM: JobId): The identifier for a job with a local scope. That
is the ID is unique within the service. The ID may be reused in other
instance of a Printer (i.e. Print Service) or for jobs in other types
of services (e.g. Copy Service). Datatype: abstract:int32, IPP:integer,
SM:xs:int
*new*
job-uuid (SM:JobUuid): The identifier for a job with a global scope.
The identifier is unique for a Job across all service instances of any
service type. The UUID URN namespace is specified in rfc4122. The
format used for "job-uuid" is the string representation of a UUID as a
URN. An example is "urn:uuid:a6b90f34-d0b1-1956 -7dec-009c4386fe3".
The version (aka subtype) used is implementation specific. Version 1
(i.e. time based) is recommended. Datatype: abstract:char[64], IPP:uri
MaxLength=64, SM:xs:anyURI maxLen=64
Note: I do not believe the IPP attribute "job-uri" is applicable as a
globally unique identifier.
1) RFC2911 states "Since every URL is a specialized form of a URI,
even though the more generic term URI is used throughout the rest of
this document, its usage is intended to cover the more specific notion
of URL as well.". All uses of the uri syntax is really a URL syntax.
2) URL implies not only a specific protocol binding but also a
location.
3) Locations can be specified using an IP address that need not be
locally unique (e.g. 192.168.1.1, localhost)
4) Regarding the "job-uri" RFC2911 further states that "This URI
is then used by clients as the target for subsequent Job operations.".
The globally unique identifier for a job should not specify a transport
endpoint for a specific protocol.
5) The globally unique identifier for a Job, Printer or Service
should be a URN. It should be protocol independent so that a product
that supports multiple protocols should have the same identifiers
regardless of the protocol mapping.
6) The globally unique identifier for a Job, Printer or Service
should require no central authority to administrate them. Generation of
a unique identifier should be simple from an administrative point of
view and preferably automated.
Note: Both the local and global identifiers should be mandated. For
legacy protocol mappings (e.g. IPP 1.1, WS-Print, LPR) the local
identifier MUST still be maintained. It is possible to use the time_low
portion of the Timestamp in the version 1 UUID as the local identifier.
The implementation may then keep only the 128 bit local representation
of the UUID and use it to create the appropriate protocol values.
Printer Identifiers:
*existing (Service Monitoring MIB)*
applIndex (SM: <service>Id i.e. PrinterId): The service identifier with
a local scope. That is the ID is unique across the service instances
collocated on a host. Datatype: abstract:int32, MIB:integer, SM:xs:int
*new*
printer-uuid (SM:ServiceUuid): The identifier for a Printer with a
global scope. The identifier is unique across all service instances of
any service type. The UUID URN namespace is specified in rfc4122.
The format used for "job-uuid" is the string representation of a UUID as
a URN. An example is "urn:uuid:a6b90f34-d0b1-1956 -7dec-009c4386fe3".
The version (aka subtype) used is implementation specific. Version 1
(i.e. time based) is recommended. Datatype: abstract:char[64],
IPP:uri, SM:xs:anyURI maxLen=64
Note: I do not believe the IPP attribute "printer-uri" is applicable as
a globally unique identifier.
1) RFC2911 states "Since every URL is a specialized form of a URI,
even though the more generic term URI is used throughout the rest of
this document, its usage is intended to cover the more specific notion
of URL as well.". All uses of the uri syntax is really a URL syntax.
2) URL implies not only a specific protocol binding but also a
location.
3) Locations can be specified using an IP address that need not be
locally unique (e.g. 192.168.1.1, localhost)
4) The printer may have multiple "printer-uri" values as enumerated
in the "printer-uris-supported" attribute. There should be only a
single identifier for a printer.
5) The globally unique identifier for a Job, Printer or Service
should be a URN. It should be protocol independent so that a product
that supports multiple protocols should have the same identifiers
regardless of the protocol mapping.
6) The globally unique identifier for a Job, Printer or Service
should require no central authority to administrate them. Generation of
a unique identifier should be simple from an administrative point of
view and preferably automated.
Note: The local instance id in the MIB and SM are artifacts of the
model's data binding and are insufficient for use as an identifier.
IPP's printer-uri, the URL for Web Service bindings (e.g. WS-Print) and
the IP address for legacy protocols such as LPR and Port 9100 are also
insufficient. They need not be globally unique. Nonroutable IP
addresses may be used.
Printer Location:
*existing*
printer-location (SM: ServiceLocation): Identifies the location of the
device that this Printer represents. (Example: Pete's Office) This is
helpful for a human but is pretty much useless for geolocation since the
content is implementation specific. Datatype: abstract:char[127],
IPP:string MaxLength=127, SM:xs:int
*new*
printer-geo-location (SM:ServiceGeoLocation): This identifies the
location of the associated device using the World Geodetic System
1984(WGS84). The means for expressing the location information is the
same as used in DNS (rfc1876) Datatype: abstract:class, IPP:collection,
SM:sequence
*new*(modified)
size (SM:Size) (0x00 to 0x99): Diameter of the bounding sphere
containing the device expressed in centimeters. Datatype: abstract:
int32, IPP:integer, SM:xs:int (Note: representation is 2 encoded 4 bit
integers(0-9). Most significant represents the base and the least
significant represents the power of 10.)
*new*(modified)
horizontal-precision (SM: HorizontalPrecision) (0x00 to 0x99): The
horizontal precision expressed as the diameter of the "circle of error"
(i.e. twice the +- error value) The units are centimeters. Datatype:
abstract: int32, IPP:integer, SM:xs:int(Note: representation is 2
encoded 4 bit integers(0-9). Most significant represents the base and
the least significant represents the power of 10.)
*new*(modified)
vertical-precision (SM: VerticalPrecision) (0x00 to 0x99): The vertical
precision expressed as the diameter of the "circle of error" (i.e. twice
the +- error value) The units are centimeters. Datatype:
abstract:integer, IPP: int32, SM:xs:int(Note: representation is 2
encoded 4 bit integers(0-9). Most significant represents the base and
the least significant represents the power of 10.)
*new* (modified)
latitude (SM:Latitude(1823483648 to 4618967296): ): The latitude of the
center of the sphere described by the size attribute. Expressed in
thousandths of a second of arc. The value 2147483648 (231) represents
the equator. Values above that are north and below are south.
Datatype: abstract: int32, IPP:integer, SM:xs:int
*new* (corrected) (modified)
longitude (SM:Latitude) (1499483648 to 4942967296) The longitude of the
center of the sphere described by the size attribute. Expressed in
thousandths of a second of arc. The value 2147483648 (231) represents
the prime meridian. Values above that are east and below are west. The
value is rounded away from the prime meridian Datatype: abstract:
int32, IPP:integer, SM:xs:int
*new* (modified)
altitude (SM:Altitude) (0 to MAX): The altitude of the center of the
sphere described by the size attribute. Expressed in centimeters from a
base of 100,000m below the reference spheroid used by GPS [WGS 84].
Altitude above (or below) sea level may be used as an approximation of
altitude relative to the [WGS 84] spheroid, though due to the Earth's
surface not being a perfect spheroid, there will be differences.
Datatype: abstract: int32, IPP:integer, SM:xs:int
Note: There is disagreement on the semantics for all the attributes
between what is posted on <http://pwg-wiki.wikispaces.com/Geolocation>
and what I have in the definition above. I took the definition directly
from rfc1876 (I think). See included text from rfc1876 and the location
example below.
Peter Zehler
Xerox Research Center Webster
Email: Peter.Zehler at Xerox.com <mailto:Peter.Zehler at Xerox.com>
Voice: (585) 265-8755
FAX: (585) 265-7441
US Mail: Peter Zehler
Xerox Corp.
800 Phillips Rd.
M/S 128-25E
Webster NY, 14580-9701
From rfc1876 section 2 <http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1876.txt>
SIZE The diameter of a sphere enclosing the described entity, in
centimeters, expressed as a pair of four-bit unsigned
integers, each ranging from zero to nine, with the most
significant four bits representing the base and the second
number representing the power of ten by which to multiply
the base. This allows sizes from 0e0 (<1cm) to 9e9
(90,000km) to be expressed. This representation was chosen
such that the hexadecimal representation can be read by
eye; 0x15 = 1e5. Four-bit values greater than 9 are
undefined, as are values with a base of zero and a non-zero
exponent.
Since 20000000m (represented by the value 0x29) is greater
than the equatorial diameter of the WGS 84 ellipsoid
(12756274m), it is therefore suitable for use as a
"worldwide" size.
HORIZ PRE The horizontal precision of the data, in centimeters,
expressed using the same representation as SIZE. This is
the diameter of the horizontal "circle of error", rather
than a "plus or minus" value. (This was chosen to match
the interpretation of SIZE; to get a "plus or minus" value,
divide by 2.)
VERT PRE The vertical precision of the data, in centimeters,
expressed using the sane representation as for SIZE. This
is the total potential vertical error, rather than a "plus
or minus" value. (This was chosen to match the
interpretation of SIZE; to get a "plus or minus" value,
divide by 2.) Note that if altitude above or below sea
level is used as an approximation for altitude relative to
the [WGS 84] ellipsoid, the precision value should be
adjusted.
LATITUDE The latitude of the center of the sphere described by the
SIZE field, expressed as a 32-bit integer, most significant
octet first (network standard byte order), in thousandths
of a second of arc. 2^31 represents the equator; numbers
above that are north latitude.
LONGITUDE The longitude of the center of the sphere described by the
SIZE field, expressed as a 32-bit integer, most significant
octet first (network standard byte order), in thousandths
of a second of arc, rounded away from the prime meridian.
2^31 represents the prime meridian; numbers above that are
east longitude.
ALTITUDE The altitude of the center of the sphere described by the
SIZE field, expressed as a 32-bit integer, most significant
octet first (network standard byte order), in centimeters,
from a base of 100,000m below the [WGS 84] reference
spheroid used by GPS (semimajor axis a=6378137.0,
reciprocal flattening rf=298.257223563). Altitude above
(or below) sea level may be used as an approximation of
altitude relative to the the [WGS 84] spheroid, though due
to the Earth's surface not being a perfect spheroid, there
will be differences. (For example, the geoid (which sea
level approximates) for the continental US ranges from 10
meters to 50 meters below the [WGS 84] spheroid.
Adjustments to ALTITUDE and/or VERT PRE will be necessary
in most cases. The Defense Mapping Agency publishes geoid
height values relative to the [WGS 84] ellipsoid.
2-Dimmensional Location of my office printer
Google Map URL:
http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=800+phillips
+rd+webster+ny+14580&sll=37.0625,-95.677068&sspn=62.226996,106.962891&ie
=UTF8&hq=&hnear=800+Phillips+Rd,+Webster,+Monroe,+New+York+14580&ll=43.2
20973,-77.417162&spn=0.001781,0.003264&t=h&z=19
Location representations:
Decimal Degrees (WGS84)
Latitude Longitude
43.220973 -77.417162
Degrees, Minutes & Seconds
Latitude Longitude
N43 13 15 W77 25 01
GPS
Latitude Longitude
N 43 13.258 W 77 25.030
UTM
X Y
18N 303685 4788191
My office elevation:
12800 centimeters (419 feet) above sea level
Size of Printer:
91 centimeter (3 feet)
Margin of error
183 centimeter (6 feet)
PrinterGeoLocation (RFC1876) (Corrected)
Size = 18 (0x12) (encoded centimeter) (corrected)
HorizontalPrecision = 34 (0x22) (encoded centimeter) (corrected)
VerticalPrecision = 34 (0x22) (encoded centimeter) (corrected)
Latitude = 2303079151 (thousandths of a second of arc, 231 represent
equater) ( (DecimalDegreeLatitude*60*60*1000)+2147483648 )
Longitude = 1868781865 (thousandths of a second of arc, 231 represent
prime meridian) ( 2147483648-(DecimalDegreeLongitude*60*60*1000) )
Altitude = 10012800 (centimeter) (OfficeElevation+10000000)
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is
believed to be clean.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20100726/0242d228/attachment-0001.html>