All,
Sorry I missed yesterday's call, but I was traveling.
I wonder at Tom's comment since they MFD Overall document
(ftp://ftp.pwg.org/pub/pwg/mfd/wd/wd-mfdoverallmod10-20100329.pdf)
definitely uses the terms JobDelayOutputUntil and JobDelayOutputUntilTime
and has from the time that these terms were introduced in January. Perhaps
there is some other document he is referring too?
Bill Wagner
From: Zehler, Peter [mailto:Peter.Zehler at xerox.com]
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 7:17 AM
To: tom.hastings at alum.mit.edu
Cc: ipp at pwg.org; wamwagner at comcast.net
Subject: RE: ISSUE: Should JPS2 shorten "job-delay-output-until[-time]" to
just "job-delay-until[-time]" to align with MFD (and PWG Semantic Model)?
Tom,
The PWG Semantic Model schema uses JobDelayOutputUntil and
JobDelayOutputUntilTime which aligns with the JSP2 specification. (schema
elements dropped the '-' and uppercased the following letter) I prefer to
have the schema track JPS2 and I think the JPS2 attribute name is more
descriptive. The MFD specification will synch up with JPS2 when it is in
final form.
Pete
Peter Zehler
Xerox Research Center Webster
Email: Peter.Zehler at Xerox.com
Voice: (585) 265-8755
FAX: (585) 265-7441
US Mail: Peter Zehler
Xerox Corp.
800 Phillips Rd.
M/S 128-25E
Webster NY, 14580-9701
From: Tom Hastings [mailto:tom.hastings at verizon.net]
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 2:13 AM
To: Zehler, Peter
Cc: ipp at pwg.org
Subject: ISSUE: Should JPS2 shorten "job-delay-output-until[-time]" to just
"job-delay-until[-time]" to align with MFD (and PWG Semantic Model)?
Peter,
ISSUE: Should we remove the "-output" from the name to align the names more
with the MFD spec (and PWG Semantic Mode)?
In other words:
"job-delay-until"
instead of :
"job-delay-output-until"
and:
ISSUE: Should we remove the "-output" from the name to align the names more
with the MFD spec (and PWG Semantic Mode)?
In other words:
"job-delay-until-time"
instead of :
"job-delay-output-until-time"
Tom
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.pwg.org/pipermail/ipp/attachments/20100420/bba9b341/attachment-0001.html>